Court reserves order on JNU students’ bail plea

The prosecution said Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya were the main organisers of the February 9 event.

March 17, 2016 02:34 am | Updated November 17, 2021 02:02 am IST - NEW DELHI:

Jawaharlal Nehru University students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya,  who are facing charges of sedition. File Photo

Jawaharlal Nehru University students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya, who are facing charges of sedition. File Photo

A sessions court here on Wednesday reserved its order for Friday on the >bail applications of Jawaharlal Nehru University students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya , arrested in a sedition case, after the prosecution contended that the two were the main organisers of the controversial February 9 event on the varsity campus.

While the police said the allegations against them were grave, both Mr. Khalid and Mr. Bhattacharya raised the plea of parity with the JNU Students Union president Kanhaiya Kumar, who has been released by the Delhi High Court on an interim bail for six months.

The applicants also said the incident did not attract the criminal provisions of sedition.

Counsel Trideep Pais contended that the two deserved to get the relief like Mr. Kumar.

‘Intention of students was to create hatred’

The public prosecutor, who opposed the bail plea of >JNU students Umar Khalid and Anirban Bhattacharya at the sessions court here on Wednesday, said the case against JNU students union leader Kanhaiya Kumar was different from that against the applicants. Mr. Kumar was not the organiser of the progra-mme commemorating the hanging of Afzal Guru at the varsity campus on February 9.

The public prosecutor also contended that the intention of the two students, now in judicial custody, was to “create hatred” against the established government, which attracted sedition charges.

Referred to Chief Justice

Meanwhile, the Delhi High Court’s Bench of Justice Pratibha Rani on Wednesday referred a batch of petitions seeking cancellation of the interim bail granted to Mr. Kumar to the Chief Justice for allocating them before another Bench for hearing.

The judge passed the order after counsel for one of the petitioners took exception to the court’s warning that it could impose a cost on them along with the dismissal of petitions.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.