Anderson’s extradition documents confidential: CBI

July 11, 2010 03:01 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:52 pm IST - New Delhi

Survivors of the Bhopal gas tragedy demonstrating outside the district court in Bhopal. File Photo: A.M. Faruqui

Survivors of the Bhopal gas tragedy demonstrating outside the district court in Bhopal. File Photo: A.M. Faruqui

Even 26 years after the Bhopal gas leak killed over 15,000 people, the CBI refuses to reveal the details of its correspondence with External Affairs Ministry on the extradition of main accused Warren Anderson saying disclosure would impede the process of bringing him back.

A former Joint Director of the agency who led the probe into the disaster between 1994-95 had claimed that MEA had asked the CBI not to follow Anderson’s extradition.

CBI had moved for the extradition of Anderson after he was declared absconder in 1993.

In an RTI reply to Abhishek Shukla the agency now says that the correspondence between MEA and CBI which took place 15 years ago could not be revealed as it would “impede the process of extradition and prosecution” of Anderson.

CBI’s DIG Rakesh Aggarwal said, “As the trial of one of the accused Mr Warren Anderson in this case is still pending, disclosure of the information would impede the process of his extradition and prosecution. Hence the information is denied.”

It, however, did not give any reason as to how withholding of details will impede Anderson’s prosecution and extradition. The Central Information Commission had repeatedly directed that reasons be cited when seeking exemption from disclosure of information.

The applicant had demanded from the agency copies of all the correspondence exchanged between the CBI and Ministry of External Affairs during the probe of Bhopal gas leak case.

He also sought to know if MEA sent any letters regarding the extradition of Warren Anderson along with all the file notings in this regard.

The investigating agency came under fire after a trial court in Bhopal sentenced the seven accused under Section 304A, to a mere two years of imprisonment.

There was no word about Anderson in the judgement of the Bhopal court.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.