Tata moves Supreme Court for CBI probe

Publication of private conversations is a violation of right to privacy, he tells Supreme Court

November 29, 2010 12:15 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:53 pm IST - New Delhi

New Delhi: December 16, 2009 : Ratan Tata, Chairman, Tata Sons, India  during  "The Singapore Symposium", organised by CII in New Delhi on Wednesday, December 16, 2009.  Photo: Rajeev Bhatt

New Delhi: December 16, 2009 : Ratan Tata, Chairman, Tata Sons, India during "The Singapore Symposium", organised by CII in New Delhi on Wednesday, December 16, 2009. Photo: Rajeev Bhatt

Industrialist Ratan Tata moved the Supreme Court on Monday seeking a direction for a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation into the leak of the tapes of his conversations with corporate lobbyist Niira Radia.

In a writ petition, Mr. Tata said the publication of his private conversations with Ms. Radia was a grave violation of his right to privacy. He sought a direction to ensure that there was no further leak of the tapes, if any, with the government or any department. Senior lawyer Harish Salve, who has settled the petition, is expected to argue the case when it comes up for hearing.

While recognising the government's right to intercept telephonic conversations, Mr. Tata said the tapes recorded during an income-tax surveillance of Ms. Radia in 2008 and 2009 should be used only for the “public purpose” of the probe and not for any other purpose. Some of his conversations with Ms. Radia, whose public relations firms were engaged by the Tata group, related to personal details that could in no way be part of an investigation warranting such interceptions.

Mr. Tata sought a direction for fixing the responsibility for the alleged leak. The respondents cited in the petition included the Union Home Secretary, the CBI and the Income-Tax Department. He wanted the broadcast and publication of the transcript to be stopped. The recording should be destroyed within six months from the date of the recording.

Advocate Prashant Bhushan who has filed a petition on the 2G scam told TheHindu that he would file an intervention application to oppose any such curbs on the publication of the transcripts.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.