Kerry denies Obama has been too passive in Iraq

June 19, 2014 06:43 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:32 am IST - WASHINGTON

Secretary of State John Kerry. File photo

Secretary of State John Kerry. File photo

Secretary of State John Kerry brushed aside criticism of Mr. Obama administration Middle East policy on Thursday, taking exception to assertions Washington has been too passive in the face of surging terrorism in the region.

Mr. Kerry noted the failure of the United States to secure a continuing military arrangement with Iraq’s government after U.S. combat forces left. “We didn’t have operational theatre capacity at the time” of the surge in violence spawned by al-Qaeda-inspired Islamic State militants, he said in an interview on NBC.

On the broader issue of Mideast policy, Mr. Kerry said the administration has been “deeply engaged” in the region and is the largest source of humanitarian assistance. He said violence is on the rise in Iraq because Syria’s Bashir Assad, who has been under siege for at least three years, “is a magnet for terrorists of all walks.”

What we have said is that we are interested in communicating with Iran... so that Iran knows what we are thinking and we know what they are thinking

Asked about former Vice President Dick Cheney’s assertion that President Barack Obama has been wrong all along about the Mideast, Mr. Kerry replied, “This is a man who took us directly into Iraq. Please.”

Mr. Kerry didn’t signal any details of involvement beyond what is already known, but did say that whatever assistance is forthcoming won’t necessarily be aimed at bailing out embattled Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. The efforts will be “focused on the people of Iraq,” he said.

Mr. Kerry said the militant Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, or ISIL, is “more extreme than even al-Qaeda and they are a threat to the United States and Western interests.”

The former senator and Democratic presidential nominee he denied having suggested that Washington was considering working on this in coordination with Iran, saying “I don’t know where this comes from.”

“What we have said is that we are interested in communicating with Iran,” he said, “so that Iran knows what we are thinking and we know what they are thinking.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.