Australia not to pursue Assange case with US

Updated - November 17, 2021 05:11 am IST

Published - June 07, 2013 02:47 pm IST - Melbourne

Australia has said it would not pursue the case of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange with the U.S. any further as it no longer serves the country’s interests.

Australian Foreign Minister Bob Carr said that the government would not make any more representations to the U.S. on the case as it “doesn’t affect Australian interests”, media reports said here.

Mr. Carr was speaking before a Senate budget estimates committee on Thursday.

Mr. Carr’s announcement that he would not “over-service” Mr. Assange’s consular needs follows after U.S. military prosecutors disclosed that they regard the WikiLeaks chief not as a journalist dealing with sources but as a conspirator in the theft of classified information.

At the opening of former US soldier Bradley Manning’s trial this week, U.S. prosecutors targeted Mr. Assange alleging that he had directly encouraged and aided the soldier’s massive leaks of classified documents.

U.S. also alleged that Mr. Assange conspired with Mr. Manning in the theft of classified information, including advising the soldier on “finding ways to browse SIPRNET anonymously.”

SIPRNET or Secret Internet Protocol Router Network is a system of interconnected computer networks used by the US Department of Defense and the US Department of State to transmit classified information including material classified as secret.

On a query if the government would inquire whether a US grand jury probing Mr. Assange was ongoing, Mr. Carr said no further inquiries would be made because “it doesn’t affect Australian interests“.

“I’m not going to have resources allocated to it,” he said adding, “There’s been enough investment of [department] resources in looking after Mr Assange’s interests. This is an over—servicing of a consular case.”

He said, “When information emerges from the American system it can be looked at with interest. It’s not a focus of our diplomacy. Why would it be?”

Asked if the federal government would raise the question of Mr. Assange’s free-speech protection as a journalist under the First Amendment to the US constitution, reports quoted Mr. Carr saying, “It wouldn’t be a matter of concern to Australia to make a case for him. No, why would we do that?”

Australian-born Assange has taken refuge inside the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been granted diplomatic asylum since June last year after the British government ordered his extradition to Sweden for his involvement in an alleged sex assault case.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.