Manning verdict could set precedent in U.S.’ ‘war on leaks’

Manning's lawyers urged a judge on Monday to dismiss a charge he aided the enemy, saying prosecutors failed to prove Manning intended for the information to fall into enemy hands.

Updated - November 17, 2021 05:11 am IST

Published - July 16, 2013 01:21 pm IST - WASHINGTON:

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted to a waiting security vehicle outside of a courthouse in Fort Meade on Monday after appearing for a hearing at his court martial. Photo: AP

Army Pfc. Bradley Manning is escorted to a waiting security vehicle outside of a courthouse in Fort Meade on Monday after appearing for a hearing at his court martial. Photo: AP

The ongoing trial of army intelligence officer and whistleblower Bradley Manning (25) re-entered the spotlight this week when prosecutors in the military tribunal that he is facing in Fort Meade, Maryland, clashed with his defence team over proposed dismissal of the most serious charge Mr. Manning is facing: “aiding the enemy”.

22 charges

Mr. Manning is facing 22 charges relating to allegations that he leaked hundreds of thousands of confidential State Department cables and evidence of U.S. military attacks carried out in Afghanistan and Iraq, of which he has pleaded guilty to 10 lesser charges that carry a total sentence of 20 years in prison.

The offences include aiding the enemy; espionage; stealing government property; and “wanton publication” which could leave him facing life plus 149 years in a military prison if convicted, noted journalist Alexa O’ Brien, who is meticulously documenting transcripts and other data available from the highly opaque trial.

Mr. Manning’s attorney, David Coombs, has argued that U.S. prosecutors have not presented evidence that his client had “the requisite knowledge that al Qaeda or the enemy used WikiLeaks”, and it was argued that “Anything less than actual knowledge would set a dangerous precedent for a free press... because military prosecutors... stated that they would have charged Manning similarly had the organisation been The New York Times and not WikiLeaks.”

The latest turn in the proceedings could, however, have a significant impact on how heavily the U.S. government is able to come down on whistleblowers and the media organisations they work with.

Coming as it does in the wake of The Guardian and Washington Post exposés on mass automated surveillance undertaken by the U.S. National Security Agency (NSA), and the Obama administration’s subsequent international manhunt for whistleblower Edward Snowden, there is considerable risk that Judge Lind’s ruling on the “aiding the enemy” charge could spur on the administration’s so-called “War on Leaks”.

Great burden

Appearing for defence last week, Professor Yochai Benkler of Harvard Law School told presiding military judge, Colonel Denise Lind, that “the cost of finding Pfc. Manning guilty of aiding the enemy would impose” too great a burden on the “willingness of people of good conscience but not infinite courage to come forward”, and “would severely undermine the way in which leak-based investigative journalism has worked in the tradition of [the] free press in the U.S”.

He added that if passing material to an organisation that could then be read by anyone with an internet connection was tantamount to handing it over to an enemy, it essentially implied that leaks to media automatically fall into this category.

“That can't possibly be the claim,” Professor Benkler added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.