US states scrutinize ads to build case in Volkswagen inquiry

November 04, 2015 07:07 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 02:11 am IST - WASHINGTON

Volkswagen cars are lined up for sale at a car shop in Bad Honnef near Bonn, Germany, November 4, 2015. Investors wiped another 3 billion euros off Volkswagen's market value on Wednesday after it said it had understated the fuel consumption of some cars, opening a new front in a scandal that initially centred on rigging emissions tests. REUTERS/Wolfgang Rattay (GERMANY  - Tags: TRANSPORT)

Volkswagen cars are lined up for sale at a car shop in Bad Honnef near Bonn, Germany, November 4, 2015. Investors wiped another 3 billion euros off Volkswagen's market value on Wednesday after it said it had understated the fuel consumption of some cars, opening a new front in a scandal that initially centred on rigging emissions tests. REUTERS/Wolfgang Rattay (GERMANY - Tags: TRANSPORT)

For years, Volkswagen lured customers with “clean diesel” ads that sent cars zooming off the lot and the company’s revenues spiralling. Now, in the wake of VW’s admission that its software cheated emissions tests, those ads could bring major sticker shock for the German automaker.

An expanding investigation by state attorneys general into VW’s emissions claims will likely focus on every ad, banner or social media sales pitch describing its diesel cars as good for the environment. Those ads are at odds with the company acknowledging that it put stealth software in millions of vehicles worldwide to cheat on emissions tests. State laws ban deceptive or misleading business practices and violations can bring fines of $5,000 or more for each instance.

In all, Volkswagen sold nearly 500,000 “clean diesel” cars in the U.S. that emitted smog-causing exhaust up to 40 times dirtier than the law allows. The affected cars date back to the 2009 model year, so the states’ legal strategy could implicate advertisements that aired or were published since then.

“Each incident is a separate violation,” said James Tierney, former Maine attorney general and now program director of the National State Attorneys General Program at Columbia Law School. “Advertising, even if the sale does not occur, could violate these laws. Every time there was a banner on a website, every time a salesman said this car is terrific, all of that is a violation.”

Jeannine Ginivan, a VW spokeswoman, said the company was unable to comment on active or pending litigation.

The deceptive practices statutes are one element of the multistate review, which will also examine VW’s environmental harm, and is only one piece of a larger body of inquiries into VW. The Environmental Protection Agency this week said it discovered more emissions-cheating software on other VW vehicles, including Audi and Porsche models, which the company disputes. The Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission are also examining the company’s actions.

So far, the District of Columbia and every state but three have joined the multistate investigation. California, Texas and West Virginia are pursuing their own lawsuits.

States have sent wide-ranging demands for records and testimony to Volkswagen in a sweeping investigation that could last for years. The company is coordinating its response to the various requests, which include potentially overlapping information, said Kristina Edmunson, a spokeswoman for Oregon Attorney General Ellen Rosenblum, whose state is among those leading the investigation. New York, another state leading the review, has also demanded documents from VW.

Last week, the National Association of Attorneys General awarded a $1.5 million grant to support the case.

West Virginia’s lawsuit notes that Volkswagen claimed its models were the “most clean,” delivered 30 per cent better fuel mileage, offered “significantly more torque” and were “more fun” to drive. Consumers paid a premium from $1,000 to $6,855 above the cost of standard gasoline engines, the lawsuit said.

Texas’ lawsuit said Volkswagen’s brochures and Internet and television ads dismissed the longstanding reputation of diesel as a pollutant “Diesel is no longer a dirty word,” one claimed and touted the vehicles as cleaner than most on the road. The lawsuit seeks $20,000 for each violation.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.