Russia, Ukraine spar over Crimea bridge in court

The case dates back to September 2016, when Kyiv dragged Moscow to the Permanent Court of Arbitration to ‘vindicate its rights as the coastal state’; Russia claims the court lacks jurisdiction

Published - September 24, 2024 10:20 am IST - The Hague

The Crimean Bridge seen from the city of Kerch, Crimea. Ukraine says the bridge built by Russia to connect the region to the mainland impeded international shipping. File photo

The Crimean Bridge seen from the city of Kerch, Crimea. Ukraine says the bridge built by Russia to connect the region to the mainland impeded international shipping. File photo | Photo Credit: REUTERS

Bitter enemies Russia and Ukraine clashed at the world’s oldest arbitration court on Monday (September 22, 2024) over a long-running case about access to coastal waters around the Crimea peninsula which was annexed by Russia.

Far from the battlefields of eastern Ukraine and Kursk, diplomats fired legal broadsides at each other in the rarefied Permanent Court of Arbitration (PCA) housed in the Peace Palace in The Hague.

Anton Korynevych, Ukraine’s main representative, accused Russia of thinking it was above international law and could “play by its own rules.”

“Ukraine is here to prove Russia’s many violations of the laws of the sea and to demonstrate that Russia is not free to rewrite the laws of the sea,” added Mr. Korynevych.

He said the Kerch Bridge Moscow had built to connect Crimea to the Russian mainland impeded international shipping, which he said was also hampered by excessive Russian checks.

“Russia now views the Kerch Strait, the Sea of Azov, and perhaps even parts of the Black Sea as its proprietary waters,” Mr. Korynevych told the court.

“Russia wants these waters to be viewed as part of its 21st century empire.”

Responding for Russia, Gennady Kuzmin said Kyiv’s case was “completely groundless and hopeless.”

‘Internal waters’

After the annexation of Crimea, the seas in dispute were internal waters and therefore fell outside the scope of international shipping laws, said Mr. Kuzmin.

He said the Kerch Bridge was built to relieve what he termed a Ukrainian “blockage” of Crimea and denied it inhibited shipping.

“All of Ukraine’s claims are baseless, fall outside of the scope of your jurisdiction, and should be dismissed in their entirety,” said Mr. Kuzmin.

The case dates all the way back to September 2016, when Kyiv dragged Moscow to the PCA to “vindicate its rights as the coastal state”.

Ukraine asked the court to order Russia to “cease its internationally wrongful actions in the relevant waters.” Russia launched an objection in 2019, claiming the court lacked jurisdiction.

Moscow said Ukraine sought to have the PCA rule on the sovereignty of Crimea, which was beyond its scope. The court ruled in 2020 that Russia had a point and asked Ukraine to refile its case accordingly.

Hearings in the case is expected to last until October 5. The court often takes months if not years to reach a decision.

Set up in 1899, the PCA is the world’s oldest arbitral tribunal.

It resolves disputes between countries and private parties over contracts, special agreements and various treaties, such as the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.