Mike Pompeo and the new ‘Cold War’

October 13, 2018 07:29 pm | Updated November 28, 2021 08:57 am IST

Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi shakes hands with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo before a meeting at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing, China on October 8, 2018.

Chinese State Councilor and Foreign Minister Wang Yi shakes hands with U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo before a meeting at the Diaoyutai State Guesthouse in Beijing, China on October 8, 2018.

It was a day when the gloves were off. The spiralling trade war between China and the U.S. visibly mutated into what appeared to be the beginning of a new Cold War. On October 8, when Beijing was in its mid-autumn prime, Mike Pompeo, the U.S. Secretary of State, wheeled into the Diaoyutai guest house. The stately facility of elegant buildings and vast green spaces is China’s icon for high-browed diplomacy.

Soon after, he was seated opposite Wang Yi, China’s Foreign Minister, who had only months ago been elevated to the additional, and more senior, post of State Councilor. Despite the elegance of the setting, a pleasant exchange between the two top diplomats of the world’s largest and second largest economies was not in the offing. Days before Mr. Pompeo’s arrival, U.S. Vice-President Mike Pence had muddied the waters of Sino-U.S. ties. In a speech at the Hudson Institute, evocative of the McCarthy era in the U.S., Mr. Pence blamed China for most of the ailments that afflicted the U.S. — from its perceptible economic decline to the erosion of its soft power due to alleged subterranean inroads by China. Mr. Pence’s address followed what had riled China most — the imposition of sanctions on one of its companies, which had bought weapons from Russia. The battleships of the two navies also had a close brush with each other in the turbulent waters of the South China Sea, ahead of Mr. Pompeo’s visit.

Mike Pence’s speech earlier this month was the harbinger of a full-spectrum assault on China, minus the use of force — the blaring signpost of an imminent Cold War

A frosty exchange between Mr. Wang and his U.S. guest was thus inevitable. But the harshness of the rhetoric, in full public glare, took even veteran watchers of Sino-U.S. fractious diplomacy by surprise. In the testy back-and-forth, Mr. Wang slammed the U.S. for making “a series of moves” on Taiwan, as well as “other issues” that targeted Chinese sovereignty. He was apparently referring to the Taiwan Travel Act, which had opened the gates for high level U.S. visits, followed by last month’s announcement that Washington would sell weapons worth $330 million to Taiwan.

Mutual trust hit

“These actions have affected the mutual trust between both sides, and has cast a shadow over the prospect of China-U.S. relations,” Mr. Wang asserted. In his riposte, Mr. Pompeo, said, “The issues that you characterised, we have fundamental disagreements.”

Though apparently exercising restraint, there is a steady permeation in the Chinese state media of signs that a Cold War with the U.S. is on the doorstep. Mr. Pence’s speech was the harbinger of a full-spectrum assault on China, minus the use of force — the blaring signpost of an imminent Cold War that could echo the decades of bad blood between the U.S. and the former Soviet Union.

Unsurprisingly, the state broadcaster China Global Television Network (CGTN) nailed an inflection point in the Trump administration’s dealings with China. “This relationship has entered a period of turbulence after the White House and the Department of Defense released the National Security Strategy and National Defense Strategy, respectively, labelling China as a ‘revisionist power’ and ‘strategic competitor’, thus basically setting the administration's tune for its policies toward China,” a commentary on the CGTN website observed. The article warned that in its all-dimensional attack, the U.S. is likely to seek its isolation by using China’s “non-market economy” status. That would be used as a tool to dissuade Washington’s allies from deepening their economic engagement with Beijing.

Atul Aneja works for The Hindu and is based in Beijing

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.