Negotiators reached a tentative agreement on Saturday for the Senate Judiciary Committee to hear testimony on Thursday from Christine Blasey Ford, the woman accusing Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh of sexual assault from decades ago, according to two people briefed on the matter.
Lawyers for Ms. Ford and bipartisan representatives of the committee came to the tentative agreement after a short phone call, said one of the people, who was not authorized to speak publicly and requested anonymity. The person said judge Kavanaugh would also appear.
Some details of the hearing, such as the order of their appearance, remained in negotiation. Talks were expected to continue Sunday.
The tentative accord could bring to a close days of high-stakes brinkmanship that have roiled Washington ahead of midterm elections and threated to jeopardize judge Kavanaugh’s confirmation to the court.
Tensions have been running on overdrive since Ms. Ford, a 51-year-old college professor in California, went public with her allegation that judge Kavanaugh assaulted her when they were at a house party in high school. Judge Kavanaugh (53), an appellate court judge, denied the allegation and said he wanted to testify as soon as possible to clear his name.
Ms. Ford initially indicated she wanted to tell her story to the committee, but talks dragged on as her lawyers negotiated terms of her appearance.
Republicans grew frustrated as Ms. Ford’s lawyers insisted on a hearing next Thursday rather than Monday or even Wednesday and made other requests, some of which the committee chairman, Sen. Chuck Grassley, Republican Iowa, rejected.
Democrats, against the backdrop of the #MeToo movement, countered that Ms. Ford should be shown respect and given accommodation to tell her story.
As the talks continued, Mr. Grassley countered that he would end the standoff by scheduling a Monday vote on whether to recommend Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to the full Senate.
Meanwhile, Republicans viewed Ms. Ford’s requests as a way to delay voting on President Donald Trump’s nominee.
The White House views Ms. Ford’s potential testimony with trepidation, nervous that an emotional performance might not just damage Judge Kavanaugh’s chances but could further energize female voters to turn out against Republicans in November.
Moreover, the West Wing aides who had urged Mr. Trump to remain muted in his response to the accusations worried about how the President might react if she ended up partaking in an hourslong, televised hearing.
In a single tweet on Friday, Mr. Trump broke his silence to cast doubt on Ms. Ford’s story in ways Republicans had been carefully trying to avoid.
Mr. Trump mused to confidants that the “fake” attacks against his nominee were meant to undermine his presidency, according to a White House official and a Republican close to the White House. Both spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to discuss private conversations.
Other Republicans had scoffed at Ms. Ford’s willingness to tell her story. “When?” tweeted the No. 2 GOP Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, a member of the committee.
Ms. Ford attorneys Debra Katz and Lisa Banks had said that many aspects of Mr. Grassley’s latest offer were “fundamentally inconsistent” with the committee’s promise of a “fair, impartial investigation.”
They said they remained disappointed by the “bullying” that “tainted the process.” Patience among Republicans was running thin. The GOP has faced enormous pressure from its base of conservative leaders and voters to swiftly approve Judge Kavanaugh, who would become the second of Trump’s nominees to sit on the nation’s highest court.
Mr. Grassley had set a Friday night deadline for Ms. Ford to agree to the committee’s latest terms for her appearance. Mr. Grassley said that if she missed that deadline, he would scrap the hearing and his committee would vote on sending Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination to the full Senate.
Ms. Ford’s lawyers asked for another day. In a tweet aimed at Judge Kavanaugh shortly before midnight, Mr. Grassley said he was giving them additional time.
“She shld decide so we can move on. I want to hear her. I hope u understand. It’s not my normal approach to b indecisive,” Mr. Grassley wrote.
In backing away from deadlines and demands, Mr. Grassley underscored the sensitivity with which Senate Republicans have tried handling Ms. Ford.
Ms. Katz had called Mr. Grassley’s original deadline “arbitrary” and said its “sole purpose is to bully Dr. Ford and deprive her of the ability to make a considered decision that has life-altering implications for her and her family.”
On Friday, Mr. Grassley had rejected concessions Ms. Ford wanted if she is tell her story publicly before the committee.
Mr. Grassley turned down Ms. Ford’s request that only senators, not attorneys, be allowed to ask questions. The committee’s 11 Republicans — all men — have been seeking an outside female attorney to interrogate Ford, mindful of the election-season impression that could be left by men trying to pick apart a woman’s assertion of a sexual attack.
He also rejected her proposal that she testify after Judge Kavanaugh, a position lawyers consider advantageous because it gives them a chance to rebut accusations.
Mr. Grassley’s stance reflected a desire by Mr. Trump and GOP leaders to usher Judge Kavanaugh onto the high court by the Oct. 1 start of its new session and before the November elections. Democrats are mounting a robust drive to grab congressional control.
Ms. Ford has said an inebriated Judge Kavanaugh pinned her on a bed, muffled her cries and tried removing her clothes.
