Neanderthals, humans interbred a lakh years ago: study

First genetic evidence of a scenario in which early modern humans left African continent and mixed with the now-extinct members of the human family prior to migration "out of Africa"

February 18, 2016 02:32 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 05:31 am IST - WASHINGTON:

In this January 8, 2003 photo, a reconstructed Neanderthal skeleton (right) and a modern human version of a skeleton are on display at the Museum of Natural History in New York. Neanderthals may have been mating with modern humans 1,00,000 years ago, tens of thousands of years earlier than previously thought, a new study based on several different methods of DNA analysis has found.

In this January 8, 2003 photo, a reconstructed Neanderthal skeleton (right) and a modern human version of a skeleton are on display at the Museum of Natural History in New York. Neanderthals may have been mating with modern humans 1,00,000 years ago, tens of thousands of years earlier than previously thought, a new study based on several different methods of DNA analysis has found.

Neanderthals may have been mating with modern humans 100,000 years ago, tens of thousands of years earlier than previously thought, a new study based on several different methods of DNA analysis has found.

Scientists provide the first genetic evidence of a scenario in which early modern humans left the African continent and mixed with the now-extinct members of the human family prior to the migration “out of Africa” of the ancestors of present-day non-Africans, less than 65,000 years ago.

It was known already, though unproved

“It’s been known for several years, following the first sequencing of the Neanderthal genome in 2010, that Neanderthals and humans must have interbred,” said Professor Adam Siepel, from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory (CSHL) in the U.S.

“But the data so far refers to an event dating to around 47,000-65,000 years ago, around the time that human populations emigrated from Africa. The event we found appears considerably older than that event,” said Prof. Siepel.

“One very interesting thing about our finding is that it shows a signal of breeding in the ‘opposite’ direction from that already known,” he said. “That is, we show human DNA in a Neanderthal genome, rather than Neanderthal DNA in human genomes.”

Arrived at, using advanced algorithms

This finding, the result of several kinds of advanced computer modelling algorithms comparing complete genomes of hundreds of contemporary humans with complete and partial genomes of four archaic humans, has implications for our knowledge of human migration patterns.

People living today who are of European, Eurasian and Asian descent have well-identified Neanderthal-derived segments in their genome.

These fragments are traces of interbreeding that followed the “out of Africa” human migration dating to about 60,000 years ago.

They imply that children born of Neanderthal-modern human pairings outside of Africa were raised among the modern humans and ultimately bred with other humans, explaining how bits of Neanderthal DNA remain in human genomes.

Interbreeding, out of Africa

Contemporary Africans, however, do not have detectable traces of Neanderthal DNA in their genomes. This indicates that whatever sexual contact occurred between modern humans and Neanderthals occurred among humans who left the African continent.

“Ancestors of present-day African populations likely didn’t have the opportunity to interbreed with Neanderthals, who lived largely outside of Africa,” said co-author Ilan Gronau, a former member of Prof. Siepel’s Lab who is now at the Herzliya Interdisciplinary Centre, Israel.

The team’s evidence of “gene flow” from descendants of modern humans into the Neanderthal genome applies to one specific Neanderthal, whose remains were found some years ago in a cave in south-western Siberia, in the Altai Mountains, near the Russia-Mongolia border.

“The signal we are seeing in the Altai Neanderthal probably comes from an interbreeding event that occurred after this Neanderthal lineage diverged from its archaic cousins, a little more than 1,00,000 years ago,” Prof. Siepel added.

The study appears in the journal Nature .

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.