Gulf oil leak video could haunt Obama: poll

June 19, 2010 10:05 am | Updated December 04, 2021 10:52 pm IST - WASHINGTON

The Q4000 drilling rig operations in the Gulf of Mexico at the disaster site on June 16. Photo: AP

The Q4000 drilling rig operations in the Gulf of Mexico at the disaster site on June 16. Photo: AP

Will the Gulf oil leak camera engulf President Barack Obama?

It is nearly impossible to avoid the live video of the coal-gray oil gushing from BP’s well a mile (1,500 meters) below the Gulf of Mexico’s surface. According to an Associated Press-GfK Poll this week, 88 per cent of the public has viewed it “a picture so sharp that it’s tantalizingly easy to wonder why someone doesn’t just stuff a rag into the ruptured pipe.

The video is a daily reminder that two months after the oil rig explosion that killed 11 and caused the massive leak and resulting environmental and economic damage, BP still hasn’t plugged the well. The AP-GfK Poll shows that so far people are more upset with BP than Obama - 83 per cent disapprove of how the British-based oil company is handling the disaster, compared with 52 per cent unhappy with the president.

It was the White House and Democratic lawmakers who originally pressed BP to make the videos available. Yet if the crude continues to flow, the images could morph into a vivid symbol of the intractable problems Mr. Obama has yet to solve to the satisfaction of a demanding public “not just the Gulf’s environmental disaster, but the limp economy and feeble job market, too.

“Certainly what they want is for us to focus on what they’ve done right,” Paul Freedman, who teaches about public opinion, media and politics at the University of Virginia, said of the White House. “And to the extent that that’s still a problem, I’m not sure it helps them,” he said of the video.

Democrats and environmental advocates say the relentless pictures are helpful politically because they highlight a problem that people know was caused by an oil company, not the president. They also hope the images “plus pictures of oil-covered birds and beaches” will win greater public acceptance of cleaner energy sources. Mr. Obama called for such a transition in an Oval Office speech Tuesday.

The biggest nightmare for the administration and Democrats seeking re-election in November would be for the video to become a 2010 version of how TV networks tallied the number of days American hostages were held in Iran during 1979 and 1980. Every day, newscasts depicted the count in the corner of the TV screen, fuelling the public’s loss of patience with President Jimmy Carter and contributing to his re-election defeat by Ronald Reagan.

“If this becomes like the Iran hostage crisis, it’s very bad news for Obama,” said Darrell West, who studies campaigns and mass media at the liberal-leaning Brookings Institution.

There was a taste of it Thursday.

“Today is the 59th day of the BP oil spill that has devastated much of the Gulf of Mexico,” is how Rep. Bart Stupak, a Democrat, opened his House subcommittee’s hearing for questioning of BP chief executive Tony Hayward. CNN featured the gushing oil as an inset in its coverage of the hearing.

At that same session, Rep. Michael Burgess, a Republican, said of the video feed, “People are watching that thing” on their computers. “It’s driving people crazy to watch that thing bubbling in Gulf.”

Some doubt the leak-cam will have much impact. Travis Ridout, a Washington State University political scientist who specializes in political advertising, says the images’ clout will fade because they vary little. Ridout said he expected the economy to have a far greater effect on voters.

Even so, some Republicans say the pictures might be useful this fall.

GOP political consultant Ron Bonjean says the images are “a daily poke in the eye to Americans,” and the GOP can use them against Mr. Obama by arguing, “If you can’t plug an oil leak, how can you create jobs, how can you reduce the deficit?”

Rep. Henry Waxman, a Democrat and chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, said he believes the video has hurt BP and Republicans like Sarah Palin who led the “Drill, baby, drill” cries of the 2008 presidential campaign. But he acknowledged, “I don’t know what the impact will be on the administration. People are frustrated, they’re angry at everybody involved.”

The AP-GfK Poll found that 74 per cent feel angry that the blowout is being fixed so slowly.

The video is not on the White House website, though it links to a page that in turn links to the 12 underwater camera feeds that BP is making available. White House spokesman Bill Burton said the administration wanted the images public “in the interest of transparency,” but declined to discuss the political impact of the images.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.