Cameron slammed over Libya planning

September 16, 2016 12:38 am | Updated 12:38 am IST - London:

Former British PM David Cameron and former U.S. State Secretary Hillary Clinton  in London where, in 2011, they planned for a Libya without Muammar Gaddafi .  — File Photo

Former British PM David Cameron and former U.S. State Secretary Hillary Clinton in London where, in 2011, they planned for a Libya without Muammar Gaddafi . — File Photo

Former British Prime Minister David Cameron launched a bombing campaign in Libya based on “erroneous assumptions” and failed to adequately plan for the aftermath, according to a damning parliamentary report released on Wednesday.

The Foreign Affairs Committee analysed Britain’s decision-making in the run up to its intervention alongside France in 2011, which the government said at the time was aimed at protecting civilians under fire from dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

“It [the government] could not verify the actual threat to civilians posed by the Gaddafi [Kadhafi] regime; it selectively took elements of Muammar Gaddafi’s rhetoric at face value; and it failed to identify the militant Islamist extremist element in the rebellion,” lawmakers said in their report.

“UK strategy was founded on erroneous assumptions and an incomplete understanding of the evidence,” the report added.

Nearly five years after Gaddafi was ousted and killed, chaos continues to reign in Libya with two rival governments vying for power and fierce battles over the country’s valuable oil assets.

‘He had other options’

Crispin Blunt, chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee, said other options were available to Britain which could have led to a better outcome. “Political engagement might have delivered civilian protection, regime change and reform at a lesser cost to the UK and Libya. The UK would have lost nothing by trying these instead of focusing exclusively on regime change by military means,” he said in a statement.

The report also said the government should have been aware that militant extremist groups would attempt to benefit from the rebellion, adding there was no evidence a proper analysis of those behind the rebellion was carried out.

Mr. Cameron was described by the committee as “ultimately responsible for the failure to develop a coherent Libya strategy.”

The former Prime Minister declined to give evidence to the committee, citing “the pressures on his diary,” according to the report.

Key political players, including former Defence Minister Liam Fox and former Foreign Minister William Hague gave evidence to the committee, as well as former Prime Minister Tony Blair.

Mr. Blair told the committee he spoke to Gaddafi by phone in February 2011 and tried to convince him to stand aside. “We saw no evidence that the then Prime Minister David Cameron attempted to exploit Mr Blair’s contacts,” the report said.

The fallout from the ousting has also seen criticism of U.S. government policy, with President Obama admitting in a candid interview with Atlantic magazine that Libya was a “mess.” — AFP

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.