Hard-line Iranian media outlets impose new $6,00,000 fatwa on Rushdie

A senior member of Fars news agency says the decree is a religious one and none can nullify it.

February 24, 2016 07:51 pm | Updated December 04, 2021 10:55 pm IST - LONDON:

Twenty-seven years after a death fatwa was issued by Iran’s former supreme leader Ayatollah Khomeini over one of Salman Rushdie’s controversial novels, "The Satanic Verses," hard-line Iranian news media outlets have raised $6,00,000 to add to a bounty for the killing of the award-winning Indian-born author.

Twenty-seven years after a death fatwa was issued by Iran’s former supreme leader Ayatollah Khomeini over one of Salman Rushdie’s controversial novels, "The Satanic Verses," hard-line Iranian news media outlets have raised $6,00,000 to add to a bounty for the killing of the award-winning Indian-born author.

Hard-line Iranian news media outlets have raised $6,00,000 to add to a bounty for the killing of Salman Rushdie, it emerged on Wednesday, 27 years after a death fatwa was issued by Iran’s former supreme leader Ayatollah Khomeini over one of the India-born author’s controversial novels.

About 40 organisations, including state-run media outlets, raised the sum to reinforce the religious edict calling for Mr. Rushdie’s assassination issued by Khomeini in 1989 on charges of blasphemy after the publication of The Satanic Verses.

“Religious fatwa stands”

“The fatwa against Salman Rushdie is a religious fatwa. Nobody in the world can nullify a religious fatwa. It has been, it is, and it will be,” a senior member of the editorial team at state-run Fars New Agency in Tehran told The Times .

The original fatwa against the 68-year-old British-Indian Booker Prize winner had caused international outcry, with the U.K. severing diplomatic ties with Iran for nearly a decade.

It was suspended in 1998 when Mohammad Khatami, the then President of Iran, announced that as a pre-condition to the restoration of ties with Britain, the Iranian state would “neither support nor hinder assassination operations“.

Declared by one “Mr. Amini”

The new bounty came to light in an account by an unnamed journalist at Fars of a digital media fair in Tehran. The story included a declaration by a man known as “Mr. Amini”, setting a bounty equivalent to $6,00,000, and listed 40 organisations, including NGOs and private donors, which had pledged the money, The Times reported.

Fars, which pledged 100 million Tomans (23,500 pounds), was among the top three cash donors named on the list, which also included the Centre for Cultural and Science Research, Miqat Radio and the Iranian Centre for Training Journalists.

A religious organisation called the 15 Khordad Foundation initially offered a USD 2.7 million reward to anyone carrying out the fatwa, then increased it to USD 3.3 million in 2012.

Total bounty $4 million

The new money brings the total bounty to nearly $4 million.

Jo Glanville, director of English PEN, an organisation that defends freedom of expression and has worked with Mr. Rushdie for many years, said: “Given the new relations between Iran and the West, I think we rather hoped [the fatwa] might disappear.”

In the early years of the fatwa, Mr. Rushdie was forced to go into hiding under police protection as bookshops across the world were destroyed and people associated with the translation or publication of his book were attacked. His son, Zafar Rushdie, who is also his publicist, declined to comment on the new bounty.

Symbolic gesture or….

Hardline organisations in Iran make symbolic gestures involving the Rushdie fatwa every year around its anniversary on February 14. But it’s unclear whether the bounty would really be paid.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.