TRP case: HC says notice of 3 days should be given to Arnab if he is summoned

Public prosecutor says complete investigation in the case would be completed in 12 weeks

March 24, 2021 07:23 pm | Updated 07:26 pm IST - Mumbai

Arnab Goswami

Arnab Goswami

The Bombay High Court on Wednesday said a clear notice of three days (excluding holidays) should be given to Republic TV editor-in-chief and owner Arnab Goswami if the investigating officer in the Television Ratings Points manipulation case desired to summon him.

A Division Bench of Justices S.S. Shinde and Manish Pitale said the police should give Mr. Goswami a clear notice of 72 hours before taking coercive action, so as to allow him to approach the competent forum for appropriate relief if he wished to do so.

Public prosecutor Deepak Thakare assured the court that complete investigation in the case would be completed in 12 weeks from now.

The matter will be heard on June 28.

The court listed a few questions to be resolved. It asked if the prayers made on behalf of the petitioners (ARG Outlier Media Private Limited and Mr. Goswami) for quashing the FIR can be entertained, in the absence of petitioners being arraigned as accused in respect of the said FIR. It asked whether the petition can be entertained for the prayers pertaining to the transfer of investigation to the Central Bureau of Investigation and direction not to take any coercive steps against the petitioners, as also their employees and agents in connection with the said FIR.

Some questions listed were: “Whether the respondents can be permitted to keep the sword of investigation hanging over the heads of petitioners for an indefinite period without petitioners being arraigned as accused in respect of the said FIR? Whether the Investigation Officer can continue the investigation by invoking said widely worded clause in the charge sheet. Whether the prayers made in the writ petition can be entertained only on the ground of serious malafide alleged against the respondents [Mumbai Police], when the petitioners are admittedly not arraigned as accused in respect of said FIR?”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.