Toolkit Case: Bombay HC order on Nikita transit anticipatory bail plea on Wednesday

Shantanu Muluk gets 10 days of transit anticipatory bail from Aurangabad bench of court

February 16, 2021 07:00 pm | Updated 07:00 pm IST - Mumbai

Students hold placards and shout slogans condemning police action against arrest of Nikita Jacob and Shantanu Muluk.

Students hold placards and shout slogans condemning police action against arrest of Nikita Jacob and Shantanu Muluk.

The Bombay High Court will pronounce on Wednesday the order on a plea filed by advocate Nikita Jacob seeking transit anticipatory bail in the toolkit case, while a single bench of justice Vibha Kankanwadi of the Aurangabad bench of the court granted 10 days of the same bail to Shantanu Muluk in connection with the same case.

Mr. Muluk, an aeronautical engineer filed his plea through advocate Satej Jadhav.

In Mumbai, Justice PD Naik heard Ms. Jacob’s plea after a non-bailable warrant (NBW) was issued by the Delhi Police Cyber Cell hours after 22-year-old Disha Ravi from Bengaluru was sent to five-day police custody.

Counsel for the Delhi Police, Hiten Venegavkar, raised questions about the maintainability of the application. He said there was no provision for transit bail under the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC). The offence was registered in Delhi. Therefore, no cause of action had arisen here.

The court, however, said, “cause of action arises for anticipatory bail but this is a transit bail application.”

Mr. Venegavkar pointed out that under Section 438 (direction for grant of bail to person apprehending arrest) of CrPC, the court did not have the power for cases outside the jurisdiction of court to grant anticipatory bail.

Senior advocate Mihir Desai, for Ms Jacob, urged the court to look at the limited purpose of granting transit anticipatory bail as the NBW was issued by the Tis Hazari court. He said they (Delhi Police) have raided Ms. Jacob’s house and seized her electronic devices.

He contended that she was an advocate of this court and an environmental enthusiast. According to them, she was preparing the toolkit but then it did not contain any violent acts or anything pertaining to taking over the Red Fort, he stated. He argued that the entire case was formed because of a tweet from activist Greta Thunberg.

The court said the merits of the case would be considered by the court concerned.

The bench exclaimed, “Should we grant transit when a warrant has been issued?”

Mr. Desai replied, “They do not need a warrant to arrest. This a cognizable, non-bailable offence.”

He informed the court that Mr. Muluk had been granted transit anticipatory bail by the Aurangabad bench. The court said it would pass an order tomorrow.

The toolkit has certain documents and enlists ways to create a “twitter storm” in support of the protesting farmers.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.