‘Systematic denial of justice to Dalits is genocidal hate’

November 01, 2015 02:07 am | Updated 02:07 am IST - Mumbai:

KOCHI, 12/05/2012: Poet-activist Meena Kandasamy, who inaugurated the two-day Bob Marley remembrance meet organised by the Bob Marley Collective at Fort Kochi in Kochi on May 12, 2012.Photo: Thulasi Kakkat

KOCHI, 12/05/2012: Poet-activist Meena Kandasamy, who inaugurated the two-day Bob Marley remembrance meet organised by the Bob Marley Collective at Fort Kochi in Kochi on May 12, 2012.Photo: Thulasi Kakkat

Questioning the pattern of acquittals in cases of caste massacres and atrocities on Dalits, Meena Kandasamy, writer and activist, drive home the “compromised nature” of the justice-delivery mechanism in our country.

The author of The Gypsy Goddess , a book based on a massacre at Kilvenmani in Tamil Nadu in 1968, was speaking at the seventh Anuradha Ghandy Memorial Lecture, “No one killed the Dalits”, here on Friday evening.

Citing the incidents of caste violence in Kilvenmani, Villupuram, Tsundur, Dharmapuri, Bathani Tola and Laxmanpur Bathe, Ms. Kandasamy said, “The judgments were as merciless as the massacres themselves. There is a large element of victim blaming, dismissing the evidence of witnesses and denial of the caste element, denial of the case element and reducing the entire case into compensation as if Dalit lives can be purchased. Systematic denial of justice to Dalits is genocidal hate.”

She said the idea of “unreliable witness” was a steady feature of the judgments, which systematically acquitted the accused. “Testimonies of Dalits are found to be faulty and unreliable.” In the case of Bathani, prosecution witnesses were dismissed and in the case of Bathe, the accused were given the benefit of doubt.

There was also a lack of judicial intervention when witnesses turned hostile. Furthermore, courts viewed technical aspects such as delay in filing the complaint as “lack of merit” in cases. This weighed heavily against the Dalit victims, who in the Tsundur incident, for instance, had to go into hiding as they were chased by the attackers, she pointed out.

‘Paper tigers’

The “caste-Hindu and feudal” nature of the judiciary made it an “important aspect of the bourgeois democratic State”, which functioned only to protect the interests of the ruling dominant castes. “Though the judiciary expressed the occasional anger, one has to look closer to understand its true face,” Ms. Kandasamy said.

With reference to the recent burning of two Dalit children in Faridabad and the 2002 carnage in Gujarat, she said, “The killing of children is a caste-Hindu specialty.”

Ms. Kandasamy termed judicial commissions “paper tigers”, and said that if the civil society had raised the voice against the acquittals in the Kilvenmani case, in which 44 Dalits were killed, the fate of other massacres would have been different.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.