SC stays HC order directing rent and deposit to Mahul PAPs

Residents say government has shown old reports, will file application

May 25, 2019 01:18 am | Updated 01:18 am IST - Mumbai

Anguished: Residents of Mahul have been demanding relocation for over a year.

Anguished: Residents of Mahul have been demanding relocation for over a year.

In a set back to Mahul residents, the Supreme Court (SC) on Friday stayed the order passed by the Bombay High Court (HC) which directed the State government to deposit ₹15,000 per month as rent and an additional ₹45,000 as refundable deposit in the bank accounts of thousands of residents and other project affected persons (PAPs).

Unfit for habitation

The State government had moved SC, filing a special leave petition on May 22, against the order passed by the HC on April 3. The HC order granted relief to the residents of Mahul who have been protesting for over a year, demanding that they be relocated from the polluted industrial area. It was declared unfit for human habitation by the National Green Tribunal in 2015 and the Indian Institute of Technology Bombay earlier this year.

In its order, the HC had also directed the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) to take the consent of all eligible persons and find out if they would prefer staying in Mahul or vacate their flats and take money from the government. Depending on the estimated amount, the State would release funds to the BMC to deposit the rent in the bank accounts of the residents and other PAPs. After receiving the amount, they would have to vacate their houses within one month and acquire a house on rent elsewhere.

The BMC, in compliance with a previous court order, has been demolishing unauthorised buildings, including residential and commercial structures, displacing around 7,000 families along the Tansa water pipeline that runs across nine administrative wards of the city. The government had decided to accommodate the displaced persons in Mahul village, but most of them have refused to move there, citing high air pollution levels due to oil refineries in nearby areas. Only 225 families have shifted to Mahul so far.

The bench had noted that since these persons were evicted from their land, if rehabilitation is not done in a correct spirit, it would be a denial of their rights guaranteed under the Indian Constitution.

The judges observed, “As the State government has expressed inability to provide alternative tenements, the only option left is to direct the it to pay the PAPs monetary compensation to enable them to find their own accommodation.”

Residents of Mahul told The Hindu that the State government has shown old reports to SC and that they will file an application in the matter next week with the latest reports.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.