Prakash Ambedkar alleges discrepancies in poll figures

Appeals to political parties to verify numbers in all States

June 08, 2019 01:25 am | Updated 08:28 am IST - Mumbai

Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi chief Prakash Ambedkar (right) at the party ofice in Ballard Estate on Friday.

Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi chief Prakash Ambedkar (right) at the party ofice in Ballard Estate on Friday.

Prakash Ambedkar, Vanchit Bahujan Aghadi (VBA) leader, on Friday alleged that discrepancies have been found in the number of votes polled, counted and declared by the Election Commission or the Election Returning Officer in all 48 Lok Sabha constituencies in Maharashtra. At a press conference, Mr. Ambedkar said, “In 26 parliamentary constituencies, the number of votes counted on May 23 is less than the number of votes cast. In another 22 constituencies, the number of the votes counted is more than the votes cast.”

‘Not an exception’

Mr. Ambedkar said that of the 26 seats, where there was a shortfall in the votes counted, Raigad has the least difference in the figures (16), while Parbhani has the highest difference of 2,101. Of the 22 seats where more votes had been counted, Wardha has the highest difference (1,380), while Raver has the least difference: 8.

Mr. Ambedkar said that exceptions can be made for one or two constituencies, but not all constituencies. He said, “We also appeal to all political parties in different States to carry out the same exercise to verify discrepancies. In case there are discrepancies, the next course of action is filing a petition in the respective High Courts. I firmly believe that the judiciary has the right to strike down any election only after that election is over. It can do so if it is proved that an election was held in an illegal, unfair manner or any other grounds mentioned in the Representation of the People Act, 1951.”

Demands EC response

The VBA has sought an explanation from the Election Commission of India for these discrepancies. Mr. Ambedkar said, “Now, it is up to the citizens of this country to decide whether or not we should continue with the use of EVMs. These discrepancies adequately point out that EVMs are not full-proof and there are chances of foul play.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.