HC reserves order on Lt. Col. Purohit’s bail plea

Lt. Col. Purohit appealed against rejection of bail by NIA court

February 18, 2017 12:53 am | Updated 12:53 am IST - Mumbai

The Bombay High Court on Friday reserved order in Lieutenant Colonel Prasad Purohit’s appeal against the rejection of his bail by National Investigation Agency (NIA) court in the 2008 Malegaon blasts case.

A Division Bench of Justice Ranjit More and Justice Shalini Phansalkar Joshi was hearing the appeal filed by the Lt. Col. seeking for bail after the NIA filed its supplementary charge sheet dropping charges of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act against him. The Bench heard arguments by advocate Sharif Shaikh, appearing for a victim who lost his only son in the blasts that killed six and injured 101 people.

Mr. Shaikh said since Lt. Col. Purohit holds an official position, there are chances that he would tamper with the evidence if granted bail. Mr. Shaikh added that there is enough evidence to show that the accused floated the Abhinav Bharat organisation in 2006, despite being a serving commissioned officer of the Armed Forces of India, thereby flouting the service rules. He said Lt. Col. Purohit, and other accused, collected funds for the organisation and directed to disburse it to buy weapons and explosives for unlawful activities.

Mr. Shaikh also said Lt. Col. Purohit is one of the key members of the conspiracy and was in contact with the main accused Sadhvi Pragya Singh Thakur.

On September 26, 2016, Special Judge S D Tekale at the City Civil and Sessions Court rejected his plea by that “prima facie” there is evidence and a case against the Col. The court said, “Considering all the facts as well as peculiar circumstances of the case, nature and gravity of the offence coupled with restrictions imposed by provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act (UAPA), he is not entitled to be granted bail on this ground,” the judge said.

Lt Col Purohit has charges of murder, voluntarily causing grievous hurt by dangerous weapons, promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc, and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony on him. He is also being charges with relevant sections under The Arms Act, The Indian Explosive Substance Act, and UAPA.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.