HC raises accident compensation five times after 20 years

Mishap left man with 95% disability

May 22, 2020 12:06 am | Updated 12:06 am IST - Mumbai

Two decades after a man met with an accident that left him with a 95% disability, the Bombay High Court recently increased the compensation to him from Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) by five times.

On July 26, 2005, the Motor Accident Claim Tribunal had directed the corporation to pay ₹4,12,042 with 7.5% interest per annum while the claim was for ₹10 lakh with interest.

The accident

On the morning of April 25, 2000, Mr. Sharma was headed for some work on his scooter in Thane. When he reached a bridge, a State Transport bus crashed into him from behind. He was admitted to the Civil Hospital, Thane, where his left hand was amputated above the elbow.

Mr. Sharma said the accident took place due to the driver’s rash and negligent driving. As a motor mechanic, his income was ₹5,000, Mr. Sharma said.

The corporation defended its case by saying the bus driver was driving at moderate speed, with care and caution, on the correct side of the road. Mr. Sharma, it said, was driving his scooter at high speed in the same direction as the bus and was trying to overtake it from the left without giving the driver a signal. Mr. Sharma also tried to pass through the narrow gap between the bus and the road, it said, and maintained that there was no negligence on the part of the driver. The MSRTC said Mr. Sharma’s claim should be dismissed.

Advocate A.M. Gokhale, who appeared on behalf of Mr. Sharma, said though a doctor had certified Mr. Sharma’s disability at 95%, the tribunal had overlooked the evidence and considered the disability only as 75%. It had reduced the claim and considered his income to be ₹3,000 instead of ₹5,000, he said.

Difficulty in assessment

Justice R.D. Dhanuka said, “As held by the Supreme Court, the assessment of damages in personal injury cases raises great difficulty. It is not easy to convert the physical and mental loss into monetary terms. There has to be a measure of calculated guess work and conjecture.”

The judge directed the corporation to pay ₹20,30,000 with interest at 7.5% per annum from the date of filing of petition, within eight weeks.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.