HC pulls up State for lack of action in tribal welfare scam

Court directs govt. to file affidavit

February 11, 2020 12:28 am | Updated 12:28 am IST - Mumbai

The Bombay High Court once again expressed displeasure towards the State government for not taking action against 123 officers who allegedly misappropriated funds allotted for the welfare of the State’s Scheduled Tribes.

A Division Bench of Justices S.C. Dharmadhikari and R.I. Chagla was hearing four public interest litigations (PIL) filed in 2012, of which one was filed by Bahiram Motiram, an Adivasi from Nashik.

The PILs had alleged that various schemes by the State government as well as by the Central government for the benefit of the Scheduled Tribes do not reach them and huge amounts have been siphoned off and misappropriated.

The PILs also state that the budgetary provision of 9% is yet to be made in the yearly budget for tribal development and the State is yet to establish 24 project offices in tribal areas to implement the schemes.

In the previous hearing, Manisha Verma, Principal Secretary of the Tribal Development Department (TDD), filed an affidavit that read, “No official of TDD has been arrested and placed under police custody for more than 48 hours, and hence the question of suspending any official of TDD does not arise.” The 14-page affidavit also mentioned, “None of the officials who were officiating the posts where irregularities have taken place are currently working in the same posts.”

After reading the affidavit, the High Court said, “All this is just an eyewash. Does the Principal Secretary seriously want us to accept such an affidavit where she is saying that she is unable to get information from the police. The State government is shielding and protecting the prima facie guilty officials. Political parties at the helm of affairs are changing but they will still protect their fraternity.”

On Monday, the court directed the State to file an affidavit with details of the number of accused arrested, FIRs registered, applications for bail, charge sheets filed, officials framed with charges, and those who have filed for discharge.

The matter will be now heard on March 5.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.