Facts available in public domain not protected by Copyright Act: Meghna Gulzar

'Chhapaak director' urges HC to dismiss case against her

January 08, 2020 01:52 am | Updated 03:42 pm IST - Mumbai

Inspiration: Director Meghna Gulzar (right) with Laxmi Agarwal at the launch of her film Chhapaak.

Inspiration: Director Meghna Gulzar (right) with Laxmi Agarwal at the launch of her film Chhapaak.

Meghna Gulzar, writer and director of the film Chhapaak , on Tuesday told the Bombay High Court that information available in the public domain is not protectable under the Copyright Act and urged a suit against her, alleging copyright infringement, be dismissed.

Ms. Gulzar’s film, starring actors Deepika Padukone and Vikrant Massey, is slated for release on January 10.

Chhapaak is based on the life of acid attack survivor Laxmi Agarwal, who has filed a petition in the Supreme Court to order the central and State governments to regulate the sale of acid. She has also advocated the setting up of a more efficient process for the prosecutions of acid attackers. Ms. Agarwal is the founder of the Stop Acid Sale campaign which has garnered nation-wide support.

A suit was filed in the HC by Rakesh Bharti on December 26, demanding credit as a screenplay writer for the movie. He has also sought a temporary order and injunction from the court, restraining the entire team of the film from releasing and exhibiting it unless appropriate credit is given to him. Mr. Bharti has appealed that the court see the film and compare it to the story and screenplay written by him.

Ms. Gulzar’s affidavit, filed through advocates Ameet Naik and Madhu Gadodia, reads, “Mr. Bharti has no right in his favour to make any copyrightable work based on the life of Laxmi Agarwal.”

The 17-page affidavit says, “Copyright protection cannot be extended to information that constitutes facts available in public domain and is based on events that have factually transpired. Protection under the Copyright Act does not extend to ideas/concepts.”

Ms. Gulzar has denied the statements, submission, insinuation and contention raised by Mr. Bharti.

Her advocates contended, “The suit has been filed with ulterior motives to gain undue publicity and to obstruct the release of the film and has failed to make any case of infringement of copyright.”

The matter will be heard by a Single Bench of Justice S.C. Gupte on Wednesday.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.