Bombay HC reserves order on Sonu Sood’s plea

Actor sought protection from action by the BMC against alleged illegal construction at his residence.

January 13, 2021 06:16 pm | Updated 06:18 pm IST - Mumbai

Mumbai: Bollywood actor Sonu Sood while sending off 350 migrant workers to their native places in Karnataka by buses, amid COVID-19 lockdown in Mumbai, Monday, May 11, 2020. (PTI Photo) (PTI12-05-2020_000202B)

Mumbai: Bollywood actor Sonu Sood while sending off 350 migrant workers to their native places in Karnataka by buses, amid COVID-19 lockdown in Mumbai, Monday, May 11, 2020. (PTI Photo) (PTI12-05-2020_000202B)

The Bombay High Court on January 13 reserved its order in a plea filed by actor Sonu Sood seeking protection from action by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) against the alleged illegal construction at his residence .

A single Bench of Justice Prithviraj Chavan was hearing a plea filed by the actor seeking extension of stay on a notice granted by the City Civil Court and Sessions Court. Mr. Sood challenged the notice issued by the BMC on October 24, 2020 for alleged illegal conversion of residential premises to commercial premises.

Advocate Amogh Singh, appearing for Mr. Sood, argued that the schedule of the notice sent by the BMC did not specify which portion was the alleged unauthorised construction. He said the exterior structure had not been changed since 1992 and the BMC could not take any action without passing the order. He added that the trial court could not hold that a speaking order was not necessary.

However, senior advocate Anil Sakhare, representing the BMC, said that after the notice was issued under Section 354A (power of designated officer to stop erection of building or work commenced or carried on unlawfully) of the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, the demolition work was also carried out.

He said Mr. Sood had carried out “alterations under the garb of beautification”. “He has built 24 rooms and is running a residential hotel in a residential building and that all the alterations and additions are carried out are against the sanctioned plan,” Mr. Sakhare said.

The civic body in its reply to the plea by the actor said, “The plaint before the City Civil Court and the reliefs sought therein constitute a malafide attempt and an abuse of process in as much as the Appellant [Mr. Sood] seeks to protect a ex-facie illegal commercial hotel which has been constructed and modified by the Appellant contrary to the sanctioned building plan, in violation of the provisions of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act and the Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act and which is operating in absence of any license.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.