SC questions Maharashtra's guidelines for dance bars

Updated - November 17, 2021 04:26 am IST - NEW DELHI:

The court said there was nothing to hide even as dance bar owners alleged that sending live feeds of dance performances was tantamount to violation of privacy.— File photo

The court said there was nothing to hide even as dance bar owners alleged that sending live feeds of dance performances was tantamount to violation of privacy.— File photo

Maharashtra government’s new guidelines for dance bars, which includes sending live recordings of CCTV feed directly to the police and a “non-transparent” partition between the dance floor and the restaurant area, did not find favour with the Supreme Court.

“Dance is an art,” said a Bench led by Justice Dipak Misra.

The court said there was nothing to hide even as dance bar owners alleged that sending live feeds of dance performances was tantamount to violation of the women's privacy. Besides, such a guideline presumed obscenity.

“Why should the stage be covered on all sides? Why should there be non-transparent partition between dance and restaurant areas?” the court asked the State government.

The Bench asked Additional Solicitor-General Pinky Anand, appearing for Maharashtra, to clarify and report back on March 1, the next date of hearing.

Senior advocate Jayant Bhushan, arguing for the dance bar owners, said the licence was valid only for a stage of 10 feet x12 feet dimension. He listed other restrictive conditions, including permission to have only four dancers at one time. These conditions could neither be added nor altered.

Recordings to be preserved

The feed from the CCTV cameras is supposed to be displayed at the police control room according to the guidelines. Recordings up to 30 days would be preserved and placed before a competent authority in case of any dispute.

In October 2015, the Supreme Court had ushered dance back into the beer parlours and hotels of Mumbai by staying a legal provision in the Maharashtra Police Act prohibiting the entertainment. But the court also gave a free hand to the authorities to crack down on the performances if they were found to be “remotely expressive of any kind of obscenity.”

‘Why should there be non-transparent partition between dance and restaurant areas?’

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.