Prosecution to submit fresh list of witnesses

Onchiyam murder trial: two more witnesses turn hostile

April 03, 2013 12:12 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 10:09 pm IST - Kozhikode:

Two more prosecution witnesses in the T.P. Chandrasekharan murder case turned hostile during the trial at the Special Additional District and Sessions Court (Marad cases) in Kozhikode on Tuesday.

Special Judge R. Narayana Pisharadi declared them hostile under Section 154 (question by party to his own witness) of the Indian Evidence Act after special prosecutor C.K. Sreedharan requested the court to do so as they denied having given a statement to the police under Section 161 (examination of witnesses by police) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Both of them were ‘mahassar’ witnesses who had signed the reports prepared by the police.

As many as 11 witnesses had turned hostile after the commencement of trial on February 11. Mr. Sreedharan moved a submission seeking to submit a fresh list of witnesses to be examined in future for a speedy trial.

Previously, the court had scheduled to examine six witnesses on Tuesday.

However, two turned hostile, one died, another was bed-ridden, and two others were given up. A list containing the names of 284 witnesses was submitted along with the charge sheet in the court earlier. As many as 75 witnesses had been either examined, given up, or termed hostile.

The two witnesses who turned hostile on Tuesday were Sajith of Puthukudi Kunnummal, Pallur, Mahe; and M. Chandran, Eruvatti Parambil Chalil of Koothuparmaba. Sajith was to testify that he had seen M. Sanish, the 41st accused, showing the house of V. Babu, the 71st witness, where Kodi Suni, third accused and others, stayed at night after killing Chandrasekharan.

He said the Deputy Superintendent of Police (DySP), Vadakara, and forensic experts had carried out a check at the house.

However, the police made him sign the report prepared by them without reading out the contents to him. The reports were prepared on May 19 and 22, 2012 and he had no knowledge of its content, Sajith said. Sajith also failed to identify the accused in the court.

Chandran, who was a lottery agent in front of the Koothuparmba area committee office of the CPI(M) said he had no idea what happened on May 19, 2012.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.