Probe into diversion of slum development funds

June 13, 2013 03:02 pm | Updated November 16, 2021 09:40 pm IST - Kozhikode:

FOR N. KERALA PAGE2: TALK OF THE TOWN-Kozhikode mayor Bhaskaran( to go with Bablu's story) Digital Photo: S_RameshKurup

FOR N. KERALA PAGE2: TALK OF THE TOWN-Kozhikode mayor Bhaskaran( to go with Bablu's story) Digital Photo: S_RameshKurup

A Special Court has ordered the registration of a case of corruption against former Corporation Mayor M. Bhaskaran and six others in connection with alleged diversion of funds meant for a city slum development project.

The case relates to the alleged re-routing of Rs.2.9 lakh meant for the construction of a drain and a footpath at Cherottuvayal, a city slum, in 2007-2008.

The project was devised under the People’s Planning Campaign.

Kozhikode Inquiry Commissioner and Special Vigilance Judge V. Jayaram passed the order after being prima facie satisfied with the veracity of the complaint and evidence placed on record by advocate and anti-corruption activist K.P. Vijayakumar against the former Mayor and civic body officials.

The court directed the Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau (VACB) to register an FIR in the court by July 22 and follow it up with a detailed probe.

VACB report

Incidentally, the court’s order casts aside an earlier investigation report by the VACB that said the allegations deserved only a departmental inquiry.

Arguing in court against a mere departmental action, Mr. Vijayakumar contended that Corporation officials could not divert the funds without the acquiescence of an higher authority, like the Mayor, and there was no point in taking action against them without probing the roles of the authorities.

‘Peruse documents’

The Vigilance court also asked the VACB to consider the documents presented by Mr. Vijayakumar on the alleged role of then ward councillor and now Deputy Mayor P.T. Abdul Latheef and councillor C.K. Renuka Devi in the issue.

Mr. Vijayakumar had earlier complained to the court against the non-arraigning of Mr. Latheef as an accused in the case.

He had alleged that the funds were diverted to construct a footpath in front of the house of Ms. Renuka Devi.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.