Onchiyam case: eyewitness re-examined

Rameshan last examined in February

April 24, 2013 01:12 pm | Updated November 17, 2021 04:20 am IST - KOZHIKODE:

The re-examination of one of the eyewitnesses, T.P. Rameshan, alias Dineshan, in the T.P. Chandrasekharan murder case was held at the Special Additional District and Sessions Court (Marad cases) here on Tuesday.

Deposing before the special judge R. Narayana Pisharadi, he reiterated that the assailants had hacked Chandrasekharan with long swords and hurled bombs soon after the attack. They came in a Toyota Innova Multi Utility Vehicle from behind.

At that time, Mr. Chandrasekharan was just five feet away from the spot where a country bomb exploded, Rameshan said. Three of the seven assailants were flashing swords in the air.

He had passed on the information about the assailants to the police after that. Investigators had recorded his statement on May 9 and 15 and again on June 22, 2012. He denied that he had identified the fourth and fifth accused for the first time at the office of the Vadakara Deputy Superintendent of Police.

The case pertains to a gang allegedly hired by a section of leaders of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] hacking to death the Revolutionary Marxist Party leader at Onchiyam on May 4, 2012.

Rameshan had earlier swooned in the court hall during cross-examination by defence counsels on February 15. The defence counsels had then raised an allegation that the prosecution witness had come to the court in a drunken state. He was subjected to medical examination following a direction from the court.

But the doctors who examined Rameshan gave a report that he was not under the influence of alcohol. They had advised rest for stress and heart complaints all these days.

Earlier examination

Previously, Rameshan had told the court that Chandrasekharan had been killed by a seven-member gang. He had also identified the accused, material objects including swords, and the Toyota Innova car used by the assailants.

Special Public Prosecutors C. K. Sreedharan and P. Kumarankutty were present in court while defence counsels B. Raman Pillai and K. Gopalakrishna Kurup cross-examined the witness.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.