Use of flag raises question on Sasikala-AIADMK ties

She has no locus standi to use party flag, says Minister; AMMK member disagrees

February 02, 2021 01:57 am | Updated 02:27 am IST - CHENNAI

CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, 5/02/2017: AIADMK general secretary V.K. Sasikala flashes the victory sign after meeting MLAs at the party headquarters  in Chennai on February 20, 2017.
Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam

CHENNAI, TAMIL NADU, 5/02/2017: AIADMK general secretary V.K. Sasikala flashes the victory sign after meeting MLAs at the party headquarters in Chennai on February 20, 2017. Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam

The presence of the AIADMK flag on the car used by V.K. Sasikala, the party’s former interim general secretary and aide of former Chief Minister Jayalalithaa, in Bengaluru on Sunday, has raised a question about her ties with the party.

Law Minister C.Ve. Shanmugam asserted that Sasikala does not have locus standi to use the flag as she is no longer a member of the party.

“We threw them [Sasikala and her nephew T.T.V. Dhinakaran] out of the party at the general council meeting held in September 2017. The two had approached the courts to establish their claim over the party but only suffered setbacks,” he said.

The “only relief” that the two got from the Madras High Court in November 2017 was to inspect the statement of accounts submitted by three banks in which the party held current accounts. “Actually, the case should have been transferred to a city civil court in the wake of the changed legal position on petitions whose valuation is less than ₹1 crore. As it has been established in the appropriate judicial forums that our camp [led by Chief Minister Edappadi K. Palaniswami and Deputy Chief Minister O. Panneerselvam] alone represents the AIADMK, neither she nor Mr. Dhinakaran is a member of the party,” he contends.

Quoting by-laws of the party, the Minister argues that those who challenge the party’s actions in a court of law automatically forfeit their membership of the party.

However, C.R. Saraswathi, propaganda secretary of the AMMK, led by Mr. Dhinakaran, recalls an observation of the Madras High Court in September 2017 that any order passed at the general council meeting would be subject to the outcome of the appeal against the dismissal of former legislator P. Vetrivel’s application for an injunction against the meeting. But Mr. Shanmugam argued that with the death of Vetrivel, the proceedings themselves have abated.

Disputing the Minister’s version about Sasikala’s position, Ms. Saraswathi said, “ Chinnamma [Sasikala] was not expelled from the party even at the meeting held by the rival camp. So, she continues to be a member.” The original constitution of the AIADMK did not envisage the abolition of the post of general secretary and the creation of the positions of coordinator and co-coordinator, she explains. Besides, according to her, Sasikala was elected general secretary at the general council meeting in December 2016 “in a proper manner”.

When asked whether the use of the AIADMK flag on Sasikala’s car means the AMMK hasn’t been taken cognisance of, she noted that Mr. Dhinakaran said the AMMK was founded only to “retrieve the AIADMK”.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.