Port Trust not entitled to exemption from urban land tax, says Madras High Court

Judges rule that it failed to establish that the lands belonged to the govt.

December 06, 2020 01:15 am | Updated 01:15 am IST - CHENNAI

Ownership transfer:  The land originally belonged to the Madras Dock Labour Board, which merged with the Chennai Port Trust in 1998.  File Photo

Ownership transfer: The land originally belonged to the Madras Dock Labour Board, which merged with the Chennai Port Trust in 1998. File Photo

The Madras High Court has held that the Chennai Port Trust (CPT) is not entitled to exemption from payment of urban land tax to the State government under the provisions of the Tamil Nadu Urban Land Tax Act of 1996.

Chief Justice Amreshwar Pratap Sahi and Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy ruled that the CPT had failed to establish that it was entitled to exemption granted, under Section 29 (a) of the Act, to lands owned by the State government or the Centre.

The judgment was delivered while allowing a writ appeal preferred by the Commissioner for Urban Land Ceiling and Urban Land Tax. The first Division Bench overturned a ruling passed by a single judge of the High Court last year in favour of the CPT.

The issue in question were land originally owned by the Madras Dock Labour Board (MDLB), a body corporate constituted under Section 5-A of the Dock Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act of 1948. In 1998, MDLB was merged with the CPT.

After the merger, all assets and funds of the MDLB were vested with the Board of Trustees of the CPT, which refused to pay urban land tax on the ground that both the entities were fully controlled by the Centre, and hence the land technically belonged to the latter.

Rejecting the contention, the first Division Bench pointed out that the MDLB was a body corporate empowered to own lands and it had been paying urban land tax before its merger without claiming that the lands were owned by the Centre.

Therefore, the evidence on record showed that the MDLB was both the ostensible and real owner of the lands.

Further, there was a June 30, 1976, circular which categorically stated that lands owned by the CPT would not be eligible for exemption, the Bench added.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.