I am interested in pursuing election petition against Kanimozhi, Tamilisai tells HC

Judge decides to hear the case on a day-to-day basis and dispose it of at the earliest

September 19, 2019 12:44 am | Updated 12:44 am IST - Chennai

Telangana Governor Tamilisai Soundararajan on Wednesday made it clear to the Madras High Court that she was interested in pursuing an election petition, filed before her appointment as Governor, challenging the victory of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam leader Kanimozhi from Thoothukudi parliamentary constituency early this year.

Justice S.M. Subramaniam was told by senior counsel Isaac Mohanlal, representing Dr. Soundararajan, that his client did not want to withdraw the election petition just because she had got appointed as a Governor after the filing of the case. She wanted to pursue the case and take it to its logical conclusion, counsel told the court.

The submission was made after the judge broached the subject when another election petition filed by an individual voter from Thoothukudi constituency challenging the victory of Ms. Kanimozhi was listed for admission on Wednesday. Pointing out that Dr. Soundararajan’s petition was already pending, he wanted to know whether she was interested in pursuing the matter.

After the clarification made by Mr. Mohanlal, on instructions, the judge said, that he would take up both the election petitions together for further hearing on Monday. He also made it clear that after service of notices to all the respondents in the two petitions, the hearing on the election petition would be conducted on a day-to-day basis and completed at the earliest.

In her petition, Dr. Soundararajan had claimed that Ms. Kanimozhi filed four different sets of nomination papers before the Returning Officer of the constituency and all the four had substantial defects including inconsistent claims with regard to the Assembly constituency in which she had registered herself as a voter.

Though the Returning Officer ought to have rejected the nomination papers, he ended up accepting one of them despite an objection filed by the election petitioner. The petitioner also alleged that the DMK men had distributed cash among the voters and thereby indulged in unfair electoral practices to get their leader elected as a Member of Parliament.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.