DMK MLA, wife appear before CB-CID in land-grab case

Inquiry has an ulterior motive, says Ma. Subramanian

July 26, 2019 01:06 am | Updated 01:07 am IST - Chennai

CHENNAI, 25/07/2019, For City : Former Chennai Corporation Mayor and Saidapet assembly constituency MLA, M.Subramanian coming out from the  Crime Branch-Criminal Investigation Department (CB-CID) office after appearing before a DSP for enquiry inconnection with a land scam in Chennai on Thursday. Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam / The Hindu

CHENNAI, 25/07/2019, For City : Former Chennai Corporation Mayor and Saidapet assembly constituency MLA, M.Subramanian coming out from the Crime Branch-Criminal Investigation Department (CB-CID) office after appearing before a DSP for enquiry inconnection with a land scam in Chennai on Thursday. Photo: B. Jothi Ramalingam / The Hindu

Former Chennai Mayor and DMK MLA Ma. Subramanian and his wife Kalpana Subramanian appeared before a Deputy Superintendent of Police for an inquiry in connection with a case booked against them by the CB-CID for having allegedly grabbed a government property in Guindy through false claims and fabricated documents.

They appeared at the CB-CID office at 11 a.m. and came out after 1.15 p.m. Talking to reporters, Mr. Subramanian said, “This case was registered with an ulterior motive to damage my image and scuttle my political career. I will not be cowed down. I will face the case legally.”

He said that he had brought the superstructure of the building from[S.K.] Kannan. “No legal heir of Mr. Kannan has stated that I bought it fraudulently. My consistent stance is that the land belongs to SIDCO and the superstructure of the building was bought by me legally. It is a civil case which has been converted into a criminal one,” Mr. Subramanian claimed.

The case was filed based on a complaint by S. Parthiban in which he had alleged that the petitioners had illegally grabbed two plots belonging to Small Industries Development Corporation (SIDCO) in Guindy in 1996 and were residing in a three-storey building constructed on it. Claiming that the two plots were allotted by SIDCO to S.K. Kannan (since dead), the complainant alleged that fabricated documents had been created, as if Ms. Kalpana was the daughter of the original allottee.

After finding substance in the complaint, the police had booked the petitioners under Sections 420 (cheating), 464 (making a false document), 465 (forgery), 468 (forgery for the purpose of cheating) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) of IPC.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.