Phone-tapping case: Senior IPS officer files protest petition before CBI Special Court

Updated - November 28, 2021 11:34 am IST

Published - September 01, 2021 03:18 am IST - Bengaluru

Senior IPS officer Bhaskar Rao, on Tuesday, filed a protest petition before the CBI Special Court. He appealed to the court to not accept the Closure Report filed by CBI in the phone-tapping case.

A telephonic conversation between Mr. Rao and one Faraz Ahmed, discussing the posting as the Bengaluru Police Commissioner was broadcast on a Kannada news channel, creating a storm in August 2019. A preliminary probe revealed alleged illegal phone tapping by Mr. Kumar’s predecessor Alok Kumar, after which the case was handed over to CBI.

The CBI booked two separate cases, one pertaining to Mr. Rao’s case on how the audio was leaked to the media and another pertaining to alleged illegal phone tapping. It had recently filed a closure report in the case pertaining to Mr. Rao, stating that there was no conclusive evidence on the source of the audio tapes, against which Mr. Rao has now filed a protest petition.

‘Loss of reputation’

Addressing the media, Mr. Rao said that due to the leaked conversation, which was aired by the media, he suffered a loss of reputation and that he was not ready to accept a closure report in the case.

He alleged that the Closure Report filed by the CBI has detailed evidence on how the audio tape was leaked. “Even though some of the expert opinion reports are admittedly awaited by the CBI from CFSL, Hyderabad, the hurried manner of filing the Closure Report does not inspire confidence in the eyes of rule of law and is questionable,” he said.

However, the report, a copy of which is available with The Hindu, details how the line interception of Faraz Ahmed was legally done, with the approval of then Police Commissioner T. Suneel Kumar and the Home Department. The probe finds Alok Kumar to have got the audio tapes of Mr. Rao’s call with the LI target Faraz Ahmed on August 2, 2019, in a pen drive from a police officer with the technical cell of the Central Crime Branch.



‘Lack of evidence’

The CBI report states that the analysis of the audio tapes submitted by the media house, shows the source of the audio tapes were the LI tapes from City Commissionerate. However, with the journalist refusing to reveal her source, the CBI said they could not find any independent conclusive evidence to prove as to how the audio tapes reached the media house and hence sought to close the probe.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.