State govt. prescribing fee even for unaided schools unconstitutional: Karnataka HC

High Court found several provisions of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983 and rules framed under this law as contrary to Constitution in so far as their applicability to unaided schools

January 05, 2023 10:29 pm | Updated January 06, 2023 01:09 am IST - Bengaluru

High Court of Karnataka.

High Court of Karnataka.

In a major setback to the State government, the High Court of Karnataka on Thursday, January 5, declared as unconstitutional Section 48 of the Karnataka Education Act, 1983, which prohibits even private unaided schools from collecting fee in any name other than in such rate and manner prescribed by the State government.

Clauses on safety

Also, the Court declared as unconstitutional the Section 5A of the Act, which mandates even the private unaided schools and its employees to take such steps as prescribed by the government to protect safety and security of children, including protection from sexual offences.

Justice E.S. Indiresh passed the order while allowing the petitions filed by the Associated Managements of Primary and Secondary Schools in Karnataka, the managements of Independent CBSE Schools’ Association Karnataka, Association of International Schools, and the Karnataka Private Schools’ Committee, and several private unaided schools.

Similarly, the High Court has declared as unconstitutional Section 2(11A) of the Act, which empowers District Education Regulatory Authority (DERA) headed by Deputy Commissioner of each district to regulate even unaided schools, and Section 124A, which authorises the DERA to impose penalty upto ₹10 lakh even on unaided schools for violating Section 48.

The Court said that these provisions of the Act are violative of Section 14 [right to euality before the law] and Section 19(1)(g) [right to practise any profession, or to carry on any occupation, trade or business.] of the Constitution of India in so far their applicability to the unaided schools are concerned, as per the law laid down by the apex court on the rights of unaided educational institutions.

Punishment clause

The Section 112A, which prescribes punishment of minimum six months and fine up to ₹1 lakh to any employee or member of the management of an educational institution for violating Section 5A has also been found to be violative of the Constitution by the Court.

The Court also declared that the rules, made in 1995 and 1999 restraining all schools from collecting term fees from pre-primary and lower primary students and restricting the amount to be collected in the form of ‘special development fee’, are not applicable to the unaided schools.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.