HC summons BESCOM Managing Director to explain delay in relocating transformers on footpaths

The BESCOM had previously told the Court that the coordination committee along with BBMP officials had identified 5,245 transformers on footpath that require relocation

March 31, 2022 08:20 pm | Updated 08:20 pm IST - Bengaluru

The High Court of Karnataka on Thursday directed the Managing Director of Bangalore Electricity Supply Company Ltd (BESCOM) to personally appear in the Court to explain the reasons for not relocating/shifting the electrical transformers on footpaths expeditiously despite identifying around 5,200 such transformers several months ago.

A division bench comprising Chief Justice Ritu Raj Awasthi and Justice S.R. Krishna Kumar passed the order while hearing a PIL petition filed by G.B. Athri, a retired Wing Commander of the Indian Air Force.

“In spite of sufficient time granted by this court, the shifting of transformers from footpath not yet started. The delay in shifting of transformers affects the public at large, as all these transformers are installed on the footpath and put the public at risk and also causing inconvenience,” the Bench observed in its order.

The BESCOM had in December last year, had told the Court that the coordination committee, set up in the directions of the High Court, involving officials of the BESCOM and the Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP) had identified 5,245 transformers on footpath that require relocation.

Stating that it would convert these transformers on footpath/storm-water drains into a special design transformer centre by erecting transformers on pre-fabricated structures in a phased manner across Bengaluru metropolitan area zone, the BESCOM had told the Court that two agencies have been identified to execute these works.

Though the Court on December 23, 2021 accepted BESCOMs plea to submit a detailed action plan with time a frame to relocate the transformers, it had directed BÉSCOM to start process of shifting/relocating the transformer even before submitting action plan to the court.

However, when the petition came up for hearing, the Court found that no effective progress was made in relocation/shifting of such transformers.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.