A four-year-old promise remains unfulfilled

March 13, 2012 09:13 am | Updated 09:13 am IST - Bangalore:

Traders continue to risk their lives in the fire-ravaged Jayanagar Market every day. File photo

Traders continue to risk their lives in the fire-ravaged Jayanagar Market every day. File photo

The traders of the Jayanagar Market know all too well what those of Russell Market are going through.

For, more than four years ago, their livelihood took a beating when a major fire raged through, gutting 70 shops.

To this day, traders of Jayanagar Market continue to risk their lives every day as they continue with their business inside the fire-damaged structure.

The Bruhat Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), which owns the market, promised them in June 2008 that work on the market's reconstruction would commence in three months.

Business as usual

N. Mukund from Citizens' Action Forum, who lives in the area, said the plan has been in cold storage since then. “Flammable material continues to be dumped in the market. Shopkeepers have drawn their own power lines and there is no security,” he said.

BBMP officials say Jayanagar Market is one of the four handed over to the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) for reconstruction.

The plan

The BDA proposes to develop a complex with basement parking and four floors at a cost of Rs. 115 crore. It will house the Regional Transport Office, Puttanna Kanagal cinema, railway booking centre, Janata Bazaar, cold storages, Cauvery Handicraft Emporium, Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation outlet and BBMP offices.

The tender was floated thrice.

Mr. Mukund blamed the delay on “bureaucratic hurdles”.

“There must be something wrong with the tender conditions. I fail to understand why contractors would not participate if they were in order,” he said.

Disqualified

Engineer member B.T. Chikkarayappa said that when the BDA floated the tender for the first time around six months ago, there was no response. It was floated again two months ago. Of the three responses, two were disqualified on technical grounds. “We could not go ahead with just one tender, as this is against the rules. The last date for the third call [was] March 1.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.