SAARC a failed mission, say experts

‘To succeed, member-countries should take up people-centric projects’

March 31, 2017 08:26 am | Updated 08:26 am IST - VISAKHAPATNAM

Plainspeak:  Ex- Vice-Chancellor of Sikkim Central University Mahendra P Lama being felicitated by AU V-C G. Nageswara Rao   in Visakhapatnam on Thursday.

Plainspeak: Ex- Vice-Chancellor of Sikkim Central University Mahendra P Lama being felicitated by AU V-C G. Nageswara Rao in Visakhapatnam on Thursday.

South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was formed in 1983, and in the very first meeting the member-countries — India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka (Afghanistan was inducted in 2007) — resolved that terrorism had to be eradicated.

But even after three decades, ‘terrorism’ was the only reason that further distanced the countries, especially the two main players – India and Pakistan.

“Is this not a failure of SAARC?” questioned Vice-Chancellor of Andhra University G. Nageswara Rao at the inaugural of the two-day international seminar on, ‘Three decades of SAARC: A critical appraisal’, here on Thursday.

According to Prof. Nageswara Rao, instead of deliberating on mutual understanding and cooperation, for which SAARC had been formed, the member-countries were trying to pull the other down at international forums.

“It is the member-countries that have objected India’s entry into the United Nations Security Council,” he said.

Concurring with the viewpoint, former Vice-Chancellor of Central University, Sikkim, Mahendra P Lama, said: “SAARC could have become flying geese. But the member-countries, fearing India’s domination, have pulled it down.”

On the present status of SAARC, he said: “It is like India-Pakistan relations – no war no peace.”

‘Mutual mistrust’

He said, mistrust and inhibitions among the member-countries were not letting SAARC flourish.

“The member-countries have to borrow a few pages from organisations such as ASEAN and European Union. Where borders have become softer and cooperation is through projects,” he said.

According to Prof. Lama, the military-centric borders such as Durand Line, Radcliffe Line, and McMohan Line had actually driven the wedge permanently between the member-countries and dismantled the history and cross-cultural diversity. “Borders are viewed as national security threat. For the SAARC model to succeed, borders should be made softer and people-centric projects should be taken up,” he said.

M. Prasada Rao, Director of SAARC Centre, AU, said that the SAARC nations comprise 23 % of the global population, but it accounted for only 6% of the global purchasing power, 2 % of trade, and 3 % of FDI. This indicated its failure when compared to other groups of nations and blocs, Prof. Rao said.

Kiran Pandya, professor from Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, spoke.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in


Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.