SAARC a failed mission, say experts

Plainspeak: Ex- Vice-Chancellor of Sikkim Central University Mahendra P Lama being felicitated by AU V-C G. Nageswara Rao in Visakhapatnam on Thursday.   | Photo Credit: C.V.Subrahmanyam

South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) was formed in 1983, and in the very first meeting the member-countries — India, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Maldives, Nepal, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka (Afghanistan was inducted in 2007) — resolved that terrorism had to be eradicated.

But even after three decades, ‘terrorism’ was the only reason that further distanced the countries, especially the two main players – India and Pakistan.

“Is this not a failure of SAARC?” questioned Vice-Chancellor of Andhra University G. Nageswara Rao at the inaugural of the two-day international seminar on, ‘Three decades of SAARC: A critical appraisal’, here on Thursday.

According to Prof. Nageswara Rao, instead of deliberating on mutual understanding and cooperation, for which SAARC had been formed, the member-countries were trying to pull the other down at international forums.

“It is the member-countries that have objected India’s entry into the United Nations Security Council,” he said.

Concurring with the viewpoint, former Vice-Chancellor of Central University, Sikkim, Mahendra P Lama, said: “SAARC could have become flying geese. But the member-countries, fearing India’s domination, have pulled it down.”

On the present status of SAARC, he said: “It is like India-Pakistan relations – no war no peace.”

‘Mutual mistrust’

He said, mistrust and inhibitions among the member-countries were not letting SAARC flourish.

“The member-countries have to borrow a few pages from organisations such as ASEAN and European Union. Where borders have become softer and cooperation is through projects,” he said.

According to Prof. Lama, the military-centric borders such as Durand Line, Radcliffe Line, and McMohan Line had actually driven the wedge permanently between the member-countries and dismantled the history and cross-cultural diversity. “Borders are viewed as national security threat. For the SAARC model to succeed, borders should be made softer and people-centric projects should be taken up,” he said.

M. Prasada Rao, Director of SAARC Centre, AU, said that the SAARC nations comprise 23 % of the global population, but it accounted for only 6% of the global purchasing power, 2 % of trade, and 3 % of FDI. This indicated its failure when compared to other groups of nations and blocs, Prof. Rao said.

Kiran Pandya, professor from Veer Narmad South Gujarat University, spoke.

This article is closed for comments.
Please Email the Editor

Printable version | Apr 16, 2021 7:56:28 AM |

Next Story