Hierarchy mix-up in assigning duty for polling personnel

Officials attribute it to feeding of inaccurate data into a software

April 09, 2019 11:48 pm | Updated 11:48 pm IST

MADURAI

Concern has been raised over the alleged mix-up in assigning duty to polling personnel in many polling stations in Madurai district.

According to sources, while officials from different departments in junior categories have been assigned as Presiding Officers in many polling stations, those in the rank of professors in colleges, school Headmasters or gazetted officers have been designated as Polling Officer (PO) 1, PO 2, or PO 3.

The Presiding Officer will be in charge of a polling station and has many responsibilities, including filling up of a number of forms, submission of reports, and take decisions in case of any issues. POs 1, 2, and 3 will be responsible for activities like verification of voter on the electoral roll, applying indelible ink and keeping control of Electronic Voting Machine’s control unit.

An official involved in election work in the district said that in some polling stations, while secondary grade teachers and anganwadi workers were designated as Presiding Officers, senior personnel like faculty of colleges and postgraduate (PG) assistants from schools were assigned under them as POs. “It will be a difficult task for them to execute their job as Presiding Officers since they may not have carried out that duty in the past elections. Our training sessions are also not efficient,” he said, adding that such mix-up had not happened before.

A PG assistant, who has been assigned as PO 2, said that in the past many elections he had either served as Presiding Officer or PO 1. “In critical situations, the Presiding Officer has to act quickly and take decisions, which requires capability and experience,” he said. “Our requests to change the designation have been ignored,” he added.

Sources at the District Election Office said that the mix-up happened due to inaccuracies in the feeding of data to a software, which is used to assign duty to officials to avoid human interference and bias. “The software decides the role based on the pay-scale mentioned in the forms submitted by officials. This detail was not fed properly to the software, which resulted in the problem,” an official said.

Acknowledging the issue, District Election Officer S. Natarajan, however, said that it had happened only in a few places. “It is mainly because the pay-scale details were left blank by the employees,” he said. He said that steps were being taken to reassign the duties wherever possible as per hierarchy.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.