Regressive acts such as human sacrifice backtrack society, says court

Accused in human sacrifice case in police custody till October 24

October 13, 2022 09:25 pm | Updated October 15, 2022 04:53 pm IST - KOCHI

Shafi, Bhagaval Singh and Laila, accused in the human sacrifice case of Elanthoor in Pathanamthitta, being taken by the police on October 13 after a court in Ernakulam gave the police their custody for 12 days.

Shafi, Bhagaval Singh and Laila, accused in the human sacrifice case of Elanthoor in Pathanamthitta, being taken by the police on October 13 after a court in Ernakulam gave the police their custody for 12 days. | Photo Credit: Thulasi Kakkat

Regressive acts such as human sacrifice backtrack society at a time when science and technology lead society towards progress and development, the Ernakulam Judicial Magistrate of First Class 8 has noted.

Magistrate Eldos Mathew made the observation while granting the police custody of the three accused, Muhammed Shafi, Bhagaval Singh, and Laila Bhagaval Singh, in the Elanthoor human sacrifice case.

The alleged incident, which has no parallel in Kerala in the recent past, has stunned the consciousness of society as a whole. The spirit of the Constitution is to promote scientific temper. However, Facebook, mobile phone, and YouTube are being mainly used for spreading weird beliefs, superstitions, and rituals, the court noted.

The prosecution case is that the accused murdered and mutilated two women as part of a ritualistic human sacrifice aiming at financial prosperity.

M.C. Anish, Assistant Public Prosecutor, submitted that the first accused was a sexual pervert who used black magic to satiate his perversions. A thorough investigation had to be conducted to find out whether more people were sacrificed or were involved in the commission of the crime. The money received for the witchcraft had to be recovered and the weapon used for the commission of the offence had to be traced. Investigation had also to be extended to the pending missing cases as well, he submitted.

A.B. Aloor, defence lawyer, argued that the investigating officer was seeking police custody for pressuring the accused to yield to their unlawful demands.

The court noted that the investigating officer had mentioned about 20 specific areas where detailed investigation had to be held. In these circumstances, custodial interrogation was highly necessary for getting further clues and leading information conducive for a proper and thorough investigation covering various spectrum of the case, the court noted.

The accused were released to police custody till October 24.

Top News Today

Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.