On the move: A good deed gone wrong

When irresponsible behaviour on the road poses problems

January 08, 2015 10:11 am | Updated 10:11 am IST

The intrusion of heavy vehicles on the service road along the National Highway poses problem for motorists trying to reach the Palarivattom Bypass Junction.— Photo: Vipin Chandran

The intrusion of heavy vehicles on the service road along the National Highway poses problem for motorists trying to reach the Palarivattom Bypass Junction.— Photo: Vipin Chandran

Palarivattom Bypass Junction on the National Highway presents a classic case of how a well-intentioned arrangement can go awry.

Earlier, motorists taking the service road stretching parallel to the highway couldn’t go all the way to the Palarivattom bypass signal as the service road met a dead end a few meters before the junction.

When work on the Palarivattom flyover started, the obstacles were cleared and the service road was extended up to the signal to ease the traffic. But now the service road has become a nightmare for two wheelers and other smaller vehicles due to the intrusion of private buses and other heavy vehicles.

The improved service road is being utilised by private bus drivers as a shortcut to overtake along the left side causing immense hardships to motorists and pedestrians.

KPCC chief V.M. Sudheeran might take heart from the figures with the Ernakulam Regional Transport Office (RTO) for the bygone year.

The RTO had registered cases under Section 185 of the Motor Vehicle Act, which deals with driving under the influence of alcohol or drugs, and followed up it with suspension of licences in every month last year except April when there not a single case reported.

Incidentally, it coincided with the period when 418 bars across the State, of which 105 were in the district, were shut down on quality issues.

Altogether, the Ernakulam RTO suspended 1,273 licences in 2014 under Section 185 and Section 304A, which deals with rash and negligence driving, of the Motor Vehicle Act.

Offences under Section 185, which accounted for 1,244 suspensions, had a definite edge over those committed in violation of Section 304 A. The month of July accounted for the most number of cases when 300 licences were suspended, followed by July (278), December (148), November (128), August (112), and January (105).

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.