HC questions Railways reluctance to add just one bogie for workers

47 Bihari migrants put up in a shelter in Secunderabad waiting for transportation to their State

June 22, 2020 11:09 pm | Updated 11:09 pm IST - HYDERABAD

The Bench summoned senior Railway official in a case of transporting migrants

The Bench summoned senior Railway official in a case of transporting migrants

Expressing dissatisfaction over South Central Railway’s refusal to attach a bogie to a train for transporting stranded migrant labourers from Hyderabad to Bihar, Telangana High Court on Monday summoned its Divisional Railway Manager to appear before it.

“I will request the DRM of Railways on behalf of migrant workers to attach a single bogie to a Bihar-bound train so that stranded non-local workers can reach their homes,” Chief Justice Raghvendra Singh Chauhan told SCR counsel Pushpinder Kaur. The bench headed by the CJ and Justice B. Vijaysen Reddy was hearing a batch of PIL pleas on the plight of outstation workers in Telangana.

During the hearing, lawyer Vasudha Nagaraj, the petitioner’s counsel, said there were only 47 workers from Bihar in a shelter in Secunderabad waiting for transportation to their State. The revenue authorities were ready to book railway tickets in emergency quota but the railway authorities were not giving more than 30 tickets in emergency quota in each train.

In that case, a single bogie which can accommodate 72 passengers should be sufficient for shifting all the workers from Bihar stranded here, the bench said. But the SCR counsel replied stating that not more than a specific number of bogies can be attached to a train.

The CJ wondered why cannot a single bogie for stranded migrant labourers be attached to a train and asked Ms. Kaur, “Where was the bar in the law not to attach an additional bogie to a train?”

Recalling his experiences with the Railways, the CJ said there were instances of Railways arranging special bogie for a marriage party. When the SCR counsel said a train cannot have more than 24 bogies, the CJ sought to know why it should not have one more. “Why this stubborn attitude?” the CJ said.

The SCR counsel informed the bench that so far there was no specific request from the State government on the matter. “I will request the DRM on behalf of the workers to attach a single bogie. Let the DRM be present tomorrow (Tuesday),” the CJ said.

Earlier, the bench told Advocate General B.S. Prasad that the State government officials filed a report stating that there was no space in Manoranjan Complex in Secunderabad to provide accommodation to migrant workers. “The HC Registry officials clearly filed pictures of the building showing that there was over 80,000 square-foot space in that complex. This shows the district Collector did not visit the building. This is misplaced information,” the CJ said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.