Riots: SC to hear plea by Assembly panel over FB official summons

There was no coercive action intended against Facebook India MD, says Delhi govt. counsel

December 04, 2020 12:42 am | Updated 12:42 am IST - NEW DELHI

NEW DELHI 26/02/2020: Scene at Chand Bagh-Karawal Nagar (North East Delhi) after the days of violence in New Delhi on February 26, 2020. 
Photo Sandeep Saxena

NEW DELHI 26/02/2020: Scene at Chand Bagh-Karawal Nagar (North East Delhi) after the days of violence in New Delhi on February 26, 2020. Photo Sandeep Saxena

The Supreme Court on Thursday agreed to examine an intervention application filed by the chairman of the Peace and Harmony Committee of the Delhi Assembly, in connection with its powers to summon Facebook officials to testify as “witnesses” before it on the circumstances which led to the Delhi riots in February.

The intervention has come at a time when a Bench led by Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul is about to consider the competency of the Delhi Assembly to constitute such a fact-finding committee. The Bench had also decided to look into the jurisdiction of the committee to summon Facebook officials.

Appearing for Facebook and its vice-president Ajit Mohan, who had come to court against the committee’s summons, senior advocate Harish Salve said the intervention application nudges a “lot of issues will rise on the committee’s standing”. Mr. Salve said the application even claims the committee has an “independent existence as a juridical entity”.

Mr. Mohan has accused the Assembly of threatening him with “breach of privilege” if he did not appear before the committee and testify. His lawyers said the committee had no authority to compel him to testify. He claimed his right of silence.

In the previous hearing, the Centre too had told the Supreme Court that, prima facie, the Delhi Assembly had no jurisdiction to summon Mr. Mohan to testify as the police and public order in the Capital are not within its domain.

Senior advocate A.M. Singhvi, for the Assembly, had explained that Mr. Mohan was called as an expert to put forth “constructive suggestions” in order to prevent such incidents from happening due to the indiscriminate use of social media platforms. He had said the committee’s role was to make “positive recommendations”. There was no coercive action intended against Mr. Mohan.

The court scheduled a hearing in January.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.