Muzaffarpur shelter home case: Brajesh Thakur challenges verdict

He says trial court conducted hearing in a ‘hurried manner’

July 21, 2020 08:10 am | Updated 08:10 am IST - New Delhi

**EDS: FILE PHOTO** Muzaffarpur: In this Wednesday, Aug 8, 2018 file photo main accused in the Muzaffarpur shelter home case Brajesh Thakur is taken to a special POCSO court, in Muzaffarpur. A Delhi Court on Monday convicted 19 persons, including Brajesh Thakur, in connection with sexual and physical assault of girls at the shelter home. (PTI Photo)  (PTI1_20_2020_000205B)

**EDS: FILE PHOTO** Muzaffarpur: In this Wednesday, Aug 8, 2018 file photo main accused in the Muzaffarpur shelter home case Brajesh Thakur is taken to a special POCSO court, in Muzaffarpur. A Delhi Court on Monday convicted 19 persons, including Brajesh Thakur, in connection with sexual and physical assault of girls at the shelter home. (PTI Photo) (PTI1_20_2020_000205B)

Brajesh Thakur, who was convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment in connection with the sexual assault of over 40 girls at a shelter home in Bihar’s Muzaffarpur district, has moved the Delhi High Court challenging the verdict.

In his plea, Thakur said the trial court had conducted hearing in a “hurried manner” and hence violated his right to a free and fair trial as guaranteed under the Constitution.

On January 20, the trial court had convicted him along with 18 others in the matter, and later on February 11 sentenced him to undergo life imprisonment.

Thakur, was the owner of the NGO called Sewa Sankalp Evam Vikas Samiti and managed the place where the incident took place.

“In the present case neither the Bihar Police nor the CBI has conducted the potency test of the accused Brijesh Thakur and despite examining his wife did not place her statement under section 161 Cr.P.C. on record and thereby the prosecution has miserably failed to prove the first foremost and most important fact which is a pre-requisite in a rape case i.e. the fact that an accused who is charged of rape is in fact capable of committing rape,” the appeal said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.