Interim orders on app-based cabs today

Ola had contended in its petition that it was not amenable to the modified radio taxi scheme

July 29, 2015 12:00 am | Updated 07:08 am IST - NEW DELHI:

(FILES): This March 25, 2015 file photo shows an UBER application as cars drive by in Washington, DC. An administrative judge July 16, 2015 recommended that the ride-sharing giant be fined USD 7.3 million and be suspended from operating in California. The controversial private car company must pay the heavy fine or appeal within thirty days and risk a suspension of its license to practice in California, where its headquarters are located     AFP PHOTO / Files /  ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS

(FILES): This March 25, 2015 file photo shows an UBER application as cars drive by in Washington, DC. An administrative judge July 16, 2015 recommended that the ride-sharing giant be fined USD 7.3 million and be suspended from operating in California. The controversial private car company must pay the heavy fine or appeal within thirty days and risk a suspension of its license to practice in California, where its headquarters are located AFP PHOTO / Files / ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS

The Delhi High Court will pass interim orders on Wednesday on the operations of app-based taxi services in the Capital, while examining how ANI Technologies Private Limited was running Ola Cabs in the city despite the ban imposed by the Delhi Government’s Transport Department on January 1 this year.

Justice Manmohan of the High Court, hearing a writ petition moved by ANI Technologies after the applications of its subsidiaries for licence under the amended radio taxi scheme were rejected, said on Tuesday that the court may also put in place a temporary mechanism for running the cab services.

The Court said the matter required a detailed hearing as the rules of the policy did not seem to be in tune with the ground level realities. Delhi Government had on January 1 banned the operation of app-based cabs until they complied with amended guidelines of the radio taxi scheme of 2006.

Ola has contended in its petition that it was not amenable to the modified radio taxi scheme, as its cabs have obtained All India Tourist Permits, and it does not need to apply for licences to operate in Delhi. It also said that switching to CNG was not a mandatory requirement.

The court observed during arguments that Ola taxis were operating on diesel, which was not a clean fuel. It also made some strong remarks about the company’s stand vis-à-vis the January 1 ban orders.

The Delhi Government’s counsel said Ola had not applied under the radio taxi scheme, while its subsidiaries had applied for licence. The court had earlier said it was inclined to allow only CNG-based cabs to provide point-to-point service in the Capital.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.