In 7 years, Haryana panel gets only 7 complaints

It was set up to deliver services efficiently

September 10, 2021 12:45 am | Updated 12:45 am IST - GURUGRAM

The Haryana Right to Service Commission, set up in 2014 to ensure timely delivery of various services notified under the law, has received only seven complaints in as many years.

It was revealed by the Commission’s newly appointed Chairperson T.C. Gupta, a retd. IAS officer, at a meeting with the representatives of the Residents’ Welfare Associations, NGOs and municipal councillors at Apparel House auditorium in Sector 44 here.

Mr. Gupta said he had held six meetings across the State to create awareness on Haryana Right to Service Act within three months of his appointment.

Lack of awareness

Mr. Gupta said that 546 routine services were notified under the Act and 277 of these were available online through Antodaya Saral portal. He said the commission had sent notices to 250 officials for not providing the notified services in the time-bound manner, but regretted that there was lack of awareness among the masses to report the delays to the commission.

The Commission can impose penalty on the designated officers or any other official involved in the process of providing such services up to a sum of ₹20,000 and can also allow compensation up to ₹5,000 to be paid to the eligible person by the defaulter. Where the commission is satisfied that there are reasonable grounds to enquire into a matter arising out of the provisions of this Act, it may also, suo moto, initiate an enquiry for better implementation of this Act.

The Commission under Section 17 of the Act can take suo moto notice of failure to deliver services in accordance with this Act and refer such cases for decision to the First or the Second Grievance Redressal Authority and pass appropriate orders.

Giving details of the notified services, Mr. Gupta said as per the Act the power supply in the city must be restored within four hours. Similarly, the municipal waste must also be picked up in a time-bound manner, and the commission can impose ₹20,000 fine on Chief Sanitary Inspector in case of a delay. The official concerned can also be penalised for not transferring the benefit of government schemes such as “Laadli Yojana” in the time-bound manner.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.