Hit by car in 2013, man gets ₹23 lakh compensation

Victim was hit while crossing road in north-west Delhi; he had demanded ₹35 lakh

May 25, 2017 01:21 am | Updated 01:21 am IST - New Delhi

A Motor Vehicle Claims Tribunal here has awarded a compensation of ₹23 lakh to a 28-year-old man who had suffered grievous injuries in a road accident while crossing the Rohtak Road divider in north-west Delhi in 2013.

On way home

The victim, Rohit, said in his petition that a car had hit him while crossing the road after getting down from a city bus at a bus stand. He was returning home after attending his classes at Pusa Institute. The victim was 24 at the time of the accident.

He had demanded a compensation of ₹35 lakh under different heads but the court decided it at ₹23.05 lakh.

“Considering the testimony of eye witnesses... and other witnesses examined by the petitioner as well as the Detailed Accident Report (DAR) filed by the police containing the documents i.e. challan under Section 173 Cr.PC; copy of FIR; original rukka; MLC; photographs; site plan; seizure memo of vehicle; seizure memo of driving licence; RC; insurance policy; mechanical inspection report of vehicle; expenses and medical bills of injured, it is clear that respondent no. 1 (driver of the vehicle) was driving the vehicle in a rash and negligent manner and caused injury to the petitioner in the accident,’’ Presiding Officer of the court at Tis Hazari courts said in the order.

“I award ₹23,05,360 as compensation with interest at the rate of 9% per annum, including interim award, if any from the date of filing the DAR i.e. 03/09/2013 till the notice under Order XXI Rule 1 is given by the insurance company, in favour of the petitioner and against the respondents on account of their liability being joint and several,’’ the Presiding Officer said. granting relief.

The insurance company, in its defence, said that the driver of the vehicle was not holding a valid licence but the court dismissed the argument.

‘Allegations not enough’

“The insurance company has failed to prove by lading cogent evidence that the license of the driver was fake as alleged by the insurance company. Mere allegation is no proof in the eyes of law,’’ the court said.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.