HC grants bail to 20-year-old student in Delhi riots case

"The chargesheet has been filed. The petitioner is only 20 years of age and he is a student.”

December 05, 2021 06:49 pm | Updated 06:49 pm IST - New Delhi

A view of Delhi High Court in New Delhi.

A view of Delhi High Court in New Delhi.

The Delhi High Court has granted bail to a 20-year-old student who was in custody since April, 2020 in a Delhi riots case , saying the possibility of him tampering with evidence after release was remote.

According to the complaint, the petitioner accused, a resident of Gokalpuri, was one of three people who were part of a mob that allegedly set a house on fire and looted goods on February 25, 2020 .

The prosecution opposed his bail on the ground that the petitioner is accused of rioting and if enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of him tampering with evidence and threatening the witnesses.

Justice Subramonium Prasad stated that the chargesheet in the case stood filed and proceeded to direct the release of the petitioner on a personal bond of ₹ 20,000 with one surety in the like amount.

"The chargesheet has been filed. The petitioner is only 20 years of age and he is a student, the possibility of the petitioner tampering with evidence is remote. This court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail," the judge said.

The court directed the petitioner to inform the investigating officer about any change in his residential address and not to tamper with evidence or try to influence any witness.

The petitioner was also directed to give all his mobile numbers to the police and keep them operational at all times and not leave the NCR of Delhi without the prior permission of the court.

The court clarified that the violation of any of the conditions shall lead to immediate cancellation of bail.

The court also recorded in the order that the trial court had rejected his bail plea in June on the ground that the video footage clearly showed him taking active part in rioting.

The petitioner sought bail, saying the trial would take a long time and after filing of the chargesheet, there was no necessity of keeping him in further custody.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.