HC directs Centre to promote IRS officer with all benefits

‘Criminal cases filed by CBI against him filled with malice’

May 28, 2018 01:42 am | Updated 01:42 am IST - New Delhi

NEW DELHI, 24/01/2018: A view of Delhi High Court, in New Delhi on January 24, 2018.  
Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

NEW DELHI, 24/01/2018: A view of Delhi High Court, in New Delhi on January 24, 2018. Photo: Sushil Kumar Verma

The Delhi High Court has directed the Centre to promote Indian Revenue Service (IRS) officer Ashok Kumar Aggarwal, with all consequential benefits, noting that criminal cases registered by the CBI against him were filled with “malice”.

A Bench of Justices Siddharth Mridul and Deepa Sharma upheld a February-2016 order of Central Administrative Tribunal in which it had quashed two memorandum of charges against Mr. Aggarwal and issued directions to the Centre to give all such promotions to him as had been given to his juniors.

Mr. Aggarwal had started as an Income Tax Officer Group A’ in December 1985 and was promoted to the post of Joint Commissioner of Income Tax. The 1985-batch IRS officer had held the position of Deputy Director of the Enforcement Directorate (Delhi zone) during 1997-1998.

Cases registered

The corruption cases were initiated after he started investigating into alleged Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) violations by a businessman.

He was suspended on December 28, 1999 after the CBI registered two cases against him – one for allegedly framing the businessman in a FERA violation case and the other for allegedly amassing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income.

The tribunal had set aside his suspension order in 2003. The Centre had challenged the tribunal’s order before the Supreme Court, which had in December 2013, ordered Mr. Aggarwal’s reinstatement and withdrawal of all disciplinary actions against him.

The High Court noted that in the first case, when the approver status was taken away from hawala and arms dealer Abhishek Verma, he confessed that CBI forced him to make false statement against Mr. Aggarwal.

In the second case, the High Court had in 2006 noted the high-handedness of the probing agency and directed the registration of FIR against the CBI officers.

“These facts are sufficient for the court to conclude that these two criminal cases were registered by CBI with malafide intentions...,” the Bench remarked.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.