Forum tells DDA to pay ₹2 lakh to complainant

For cancelling an allotment letter on ‘invalid grounds’

March 23, 2019 01:43 am | Updated 10:26 am IST - NEW DELHI

NEW DELHI, 18/08/2017: DDA LIG Flats at Rohini sector-29, in New Delhi on Friday. 
Photo: Sandeep Saxena

NEW DELHI, 18/08/2017: DDA LIG Flats at Rohini sector-29, in New Delhi on Friday. Photo: Sandeep Saxena

Dismissing an appeal moved by the Delhi Development Authority (DDA), the State Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum here has directed the urban body to compensate the complainant by paying over ₹2 lakh after it was alleged that the DDA had cancelled an allotment letter on “invalid grounds”.

Upholding an order passed by a district consumer forum here, the State consumer panel said, “On a careful perusal of the records and judicial pronouncements made, I am of the considered view that the service of the allotment letter was not validly done and the direction of the district forum for the refund of the registration amount cannot be faulted with.”

“…the appeal [of DDA] cannot be accepted and is accordingly dismissed. Orders of the district forum are upheld,” the consumer forum said.

The directions came when the urban body challenged an order passed by a district forum that had directed the urban body to refund the registration fee of ₹1,500 in addition to a compensation of ₹2 lakh.

The urban body had challenged the district forum order stating that “all possible steps to communicate to the complainant” had been taken by the DDA.

“Cancellation of allotment has been done only after exhausting all the avenues available to issue the letter and when nothing was done in the matter of depositing the amount, the cancellation was done,” the DDA had contended.

No intimation

However, dismissing contentions put forth by the urban body, the consumer panel held, “Having regard to the law laid down, the inevitable and inescapable conclusion is that no intimation regarding allotment of flat has been validly reached...specific notices are required to be served.”

Further, the consumer panel added, “If that be the case, the entire edifice built by the DDA in support of their claim, falls to the ground, since no letter allotting the flat reached, nor valid notice, a condition precedent before cancellation of allotment was ever issued. Consequently, the contention of DDA raised on the subject is rejected.”

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.