Former law panel chief for gender diversity in judiciary

Justice Shah was speaking at a two-day conference organised by Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy

August 13, 2018 02:08 am | Updated 02:08 am IST - New Delhi

Former Law Commission of India chairperson Justice A.P. Shah has said that gender diversity in judiciary is equally important an issue to tackle as that of pendency and judicial delay.

‘Merit and diversity’

Speaking at a two-day conference on diversity in the judiciary organised by the Vidhi Centre for Legal Policy, Justice Shah said, “Merit and diversity should be seen as complementary rather than contradictory values.”

He called upon the Ministry of Law and Justice to partner with High Courts across the country to publish annual diversity statistics for both the higher and lower judiciary similar to what is already being done in other countries.

Earlier this month, appointment of Madras High Court Chief Justice Indira Banerjee as Supreme Court judge saw the strength of women judges rise to three for the first time since the inception of the apex court.

Data portal

The conference also saw the launch of a dynamic judicial data portal by Vidhi that contains data on gender-wise representation of courts across all levels of the judiciary, including district-level data.

Justice Nishita Nirmal Mhatre, who retired as the Acting Chief Justice of the Calcutta High Court, pointed out that merely improving diversity on the Bench will not suffice and that the need of the hour was judicial sensitisation.

The onus, she said, was on judicial academies to ensure that judges were well-equipped to handle any case irrespective of the social background they may belong to.

Former Madras High Court judge Justice K. Chandru highlighted the need to change training and learning practices of judges.

Inclusive bar

Senior advocate Rebecca John stressed that it was equally important to have an inclusive bar as much as a diverse Bench. Among other things, the participants pointed at the lack of training provided to higher judiciary, which could have a direct impact on the quality of adjudication.

0 / 0
Sign in to unlock member-only benefits!
  • Access 10 free stories every month
  • Save stories to read later
  • Access to comment on every story
  • Sign-up/manage your newsletter subscriptions with a single click
  • Get notified by email for early access to discounts & offers on our products
Sign in

Comments

Comments have to be in English, and in full sentences. They cannot be abusive or personal. Please abide by our community guidelines for posting your comments.

We have migrated to a new commenting platform. If you are already a registered user of The Hindu and logged in, you may continue to engage with our articles. If you do not have an account please register and login to post comments. Users can access their older comments by logging into their accounts on Vuukle.